Archive | February, 2007

Tags: , ,

Remake Roundup: SCANNERS, WEEKEND AT BERNIE’S, GET SMART

Posted on 28 February 2007 by Rich Drees

Scanners
David Cronenberg’s 1981 science-fiction/horror film Scanners is set to be remade under the direction of Darren Lynn Bousman, helmer of Saw II (2005) and III (2006) as well as the upcoming Saw IV (later this year). David Goyer is set to rewrite Cronenberg’s tale of telepaths who are used as weapons by an evil corporation. (Source- Variety)

Weekend At Bernie’s
Moviehole is reporting that a remake of the 1980s Andrew McCarthy/Jonathan Silverman comedy Weekend At Bernie’s is set for a remake from producers Ashok Amritraj and Jon Jashni. The original, itself a comedic riff on Hitchcock’s dark comedy The Trouble With Harry, centered on two bumbling office workers who are invited to their bosses beach house for the weekend only to arrive and find him dead. Rather than call the cops, the pair decide to trick the numerous partiers who have descended upon the beach house that Bernie is alive and well, just a little drunk. It looks like the remake will move the action from a beach house to a ski lodge, with probably very predictable results.

Get Smart
Superspy Maxwell Smart has found his Chief. The Hollywood Reporter has word that Alan Arkin has been cast as the head of CONTROL, the super-secret spy organization in the upcoming big screen adaptation of the classic 60s spy spoof that starred Don Adams. Taking Adams’ role for the new version is The Office star Steve Carell with Anne Hathaway as lovely sidekick, Agent 99. Also in the cast are Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson as Agent 23 and Terrence Stamp in an unnamed role. (Perhaps as Siegfried, head of the evil spy organization KAOS?)

Comments (0)

Tags:

New York Comic Con Photos

Posted on 28 February 2007 by Rich Drees

As I mentioned earlier this week, this past weekend’s 2nd annual New York Comic Con was a gathering for more than just comic book fans. There’s plenty to see and do for gaming fans and movie buffs with numerous signings, panels and screenings on the conventions schedule.

Sure, there’s stuff for journalists like roundtables featuring the likes of director Eli Roth. (More on Roth’s discussion with us journalists on his upcoming Hostel 2 soon!)

But there’s always the lucky moment when you catch the bizarre sight of director Kevin Smith being escorted through the halls by a squadron of stormtroopers (Who won’t slow down so one could get a good, clear photo).

If you stopped over at animator Bill Plympton’s booth you could get a quick demonstration of Plympton drawing the title character from his 2004 Oscar-nominated short Guard Dog.

Here, The Spirit producer Michael Uslan listens Michael Kitchen, literary executor for the character’s creator Will Eisner, make a point about the upcoming film. (Read our coverage of Uslan’s panel on The Spirit here.)

There are plenty of toy and collectible manufacturers with displays of their latest wares. This particular doll of The Wizard Of Oz‘s Wicked Witch of the West caught my eye. Interestingly, the face is carved with a cold beauty that is definitely different from Margret Hamilton’s look in the film. Also, note the flying monkeys on her dress.Sure, there are lots of people who drerss in costumes as their favorite superhero or movie character and sometimes, there’s nothing more absurd than two or three Darth Vaders squaring off in a hallway or stairway. But othertimes, there’s nothing cuter than this-

Comments (0)

First Look: Will Eisner’s THE SPIRIT

Posted on 27 February 2007 by Rich Drees

For movie producer Michael Uslan, it has been a decade long journey to get Will Eisner’s classic two-fisted, crime-fighting comics character, The Spirit, onto the big screen, but the long wait has been of his own devising.

“I promised and swore to Will Eisner that nobody was going to touch this project if they didn’t get it, if we couldn’t do it the right way,” stated Uslan. “And I’ve held to that promise.”

Uslan is speaking to a packed room at the 2nd Annual New York Comic Con. It’s late February and not much has been heard about the film since it was announced last June that comic book writer and artist turned film director Frank Miller was announced as the film’s director. Joining Uslan was his producing partner F. J. DeSanto to fill comic fans in on the latest news on the production.

The panel opened with DeSanto reading an email message from Miller, who could not attend due to an injury he suffered while slipping on ice a few weeks earlier. Miller briefly lamented the accident, if only because it has forced him to miss out “on all these chances to tell everybody how much fun I get to have writing Will Eisner’s The Spirit.”

Miller also cautioned attendees on what tone he planned on setting for the film. “And don’t go expecting a nostalgic, tongue-in-cheek romp here. Remember, remember how scary Eisner got whenever he chose to. And remember how he broke your heart with the story of Sand Saref. So expect some hairpin turns, some dead-end, back alley madness of the wet kind. Get set, we’re on our way to some dark places.”

Uslan admits to being protective of the project to the point where he has turned down more than one offer from a studio not for financial reasons but due to what is commonly and euphemistically referred to as “creative differences.”

“We have had many lucrative deals put in front of us that we’ve turned down over the years,” he explained. “We have dealt with people in Hollywood who have said ‘Great, you want to do a Spirit movie? That’s something we’d be interested in financing and distributing. But let’s get him out of this tie and jacket stuff [and into some] spandex and a cape. We’ll work on some designs. And of course we really need super powers so he’ll really die and come back as a ghost. It’ll be supernatural.’ I said ‘That’s a great idea and we can call it The Specter or Deadman.’”

Uslan finally found a collaborator who “got it” in Miller, when the two were having a conversation after Eisner’s memorial service in New York City.

Sin City had come out a week or two before that and I said, ‘You know Frank, the difference between you and me, I’m trying to make comic books into movies and what you’ve done is you’ve made a movie into a comic book. For the first time I can really, really see The Spirit being done, using this Sin City technology,’” related Uslan. “Immediately, Frank had all kinds of ideas so I said ‘You know, you’ve got to write and direct this.’”

Uslan reported that Miller expressed some doubts about taking on the project. “Frank’s reaction was immediately, ‘I couldn’t do that. You expect me to do something worth of Will Eisner? I couldn’t possibly do that. Who am I?’ But after thinking about this for some time he came back and said ‘I can’t let anyone else do it. I’ve got to do it.’”

Miller dove right into the story development process in a rather interesting way according to DeSanto.

“When we first started talking about the movie and ideas started to pour out of Frank’s head, he would Xerox Will’s graphic novels and start cutting and pasting them into some sort of order,” DeSanto stated. “That’s how he mapped out the initial film. I was having lunch with him about six months ago and all of a sudden he had a pile of papers on his lap and he said ‘Ok., here’s the movie.’”

“It’s not an origin story,” DeSanto continued. “When you meet the Spirit, he is the Spirit. The Eisner elements are in there. We’ll be incorporating the logo into the background. Central City is its own world. With the technology they made Sin City and 300 with, we’re at a really neat point in filmmaking where we can make that world as Eisner-esque as possible. As [Frank] sorted of hinted, we’re going to see some of the femme fatales that Will was so great at creating and we’re going to see the Spirit get into a lot of trouble.”

Although Eisner told a variety of styles of stories with the Spirit comics, Uslan is quick to let fans know, perhaps a little too quick, that these other tales have not been forgotten.

“When we talk about a darker, edgier Spirit, we’re not going to do the whimsical Spirit stories. We’re not going to do Rat-Tat The Machine Gun or Gerhard Shtoball. However, that doesn’t mean that when we move to some animation projects that we won’t necessarily cover that then. But that’s a story I’m not allowed to talk about now.”

Uslan stated that many of the familiar Spirit supporting cast are slated to appear in the film.

“We’ve got Commissioner Dolan and believe me you’ll understand why he is so different from [Batman’s] Commissioner Gordon,” he promised. “Ellen Dolan will be there. Sand Saref and that magnificent romantic triangle will be there. There are villains and femme fatales sprinkled throughout that will delight you and surprise you with the way that Frank deals with them.”

One character who will not be appearing in the film is the Spirit’s sometime sidekick Ebony White, an African-American boy who, despite being one of the few such recurring characters in comics at that time, was often portrayed as a broad stereotype for Stepin Fetchit-type humor.

“It was Frank’s choice,” DeSanto elaborated on the exclusion of the character from the film. “I think that Frank has said that creatively everybody can have a bad day and that that was the bad day for Will.”

“I think what it was for Frank was less about the controversial nature of the character than it was the story doesn’t lend itself to a little kid being involved in the action,” added Uslan. “There’s a world that he created for this movie where endangering a child like that did not make sense.”

Although The Spirit’s popularity was at its height over half a century ago, Uslan has no intentions of making the film a period piece.

“There was something important in our discussions with Will Eisner that he said to us. The question that I posed to Will was this- ‘Should this be set in the 1940s? Should this bet set in the 1950s? Should this be set today?’ He was kind of shocked at my question and said, ‘I never wrote The Spirit in a nostalgic sense. Whenever I wrote it and drew it, I was always doing something that was relevant at that time. He was in the 40s in the 40s. When I was doing it in the 50s it was the 50s.There’s no reason that this shouldn’t be contemporary or at least timeless’,”

“That’s what Frank is going to go for here. There’s going to be a timeless feel to this. The only thing I can throw back to you is what Time Burton did in our first Batman picture where a lot of people, if you asked them, weren’t absolutely sure if that movie took place in the past, present or future or some kind of mix thereof.”

With Miller hard at work on what is hoped to be the final draft of the film, Uslan is anxious to get the production rolling. However, with Miller also involved with the Sin City sequel, he cannot guarantee when cameras will start rolling.

“We are really all kind-of waiting to see how all the pieces are going to fit together, but right now if I had to guess I would say we are going first [before Sin City 2]. Anything could change at any time. Frank’s got to get up and around, feeling 100 percent. Just as a function of business, if we have so-and-so as a star and he’s available on such-and-such a date than we go. If he’s available three months later, we wait. So, these are all factors that have to be figured out.”

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

Trailer Park: FANTASTIC FOUR 2 and NEXT

Posted on 27 February 2007 by Rich Drees

We have a pair of offerings of movie trailers into today’s inaugural edition of Trailer Park for you to feast your eyes upon today.

First up is the new 30-second TV spot for Fantastic Four: Rise Of The Silver Surfer. There’s a few new moments from the film not seen in the previous trailer including our first, albeit quick, look at the Fantastic Four’s classic mode of transportation- the Fantasticar!

Fantastic Four: Rise Of The Silver Surfer is scheduled to hit screens on June 15.

We also have Next, the latest attempt to turn a Philip K. Dick short story, in this case “The Golden Man,” into a film. Nicholas Cage stars as a man who has the ability to glimpse the future and who is pursued by the FBI, lead by Julianne Moore, for his knowledge of a possible terrorist attack.

Next is set for release on April 27.

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

Pop Culture Intersections

Posted on 25 February 2007 by Rich Drees

They may call it a comic book convention, but that is really an understatement.

This year’s New York ComicCon (NYCC), which is concluding today, is just one of the numerous major similar events held around the country every year that realizes that comic books and their fans do not exist in their own isolated continuum. Instead comic fans interests lie across numerous related fields and comic books themselves influence and are influenced by those fields. So any major convention will have programming tracks that encompass not only comic books, but also gaming, animation and films. There are comic book characters making the transition to television and movies, comic books and movies being created based on the story lines from video games and games are being based on both comic books and films. And as these various hobbies begin to overlap, so too do the creative people involved.

The result is a fertile cross-pollination that results in instances where a session where J. Michael Straczynski, creator of the TV series Babylon 5, can talk about the future of that show as a line of made-for-DVD movies, his script for a film called The Changeling which will begin filming this summer with Ron Howard producing and give hints about the various comic book projects he’s writing for Marvel Comics.

Producer Michael Uslan summed it up best at a panel about a forthcoming adaptation of Will Eisner’s classic comics hero The Spirit with Sin City co-director and comic book writer/artist Frank Miller. Hollywood is always looking for good stories and there are plenty of good stories to be found in comics. These stories are not just guys and gals with super powers and colorful outfits. Films like Men In Black, Ghost World, Road To Perdition and A History Of Violence have proven that.

For myself, I found plenty of good stories at NYCC this year as well, which I’ll be sharing with you as the week rolls on. So look for stories about John Landis’ next film, a sit down conversation with Eli Roth about the upcoming Hostel 2, as well as a preview of what we can expect from Miller’s Spirit film and more.

Stay tuned!

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

Script Review: THE TONY CLIFTON STORY

Posted on 20 February 2007 by Rich Drees

Screenplay by
Andy Kaufman and Bob Zmuda
Second Draft
January 1, 1980

Without a doubt, one of the most unique comic voices of the 20th century was Andy Kaufman. Hailing from a deceptively average upbringing in Long Island, NY, Kaufman amazed audiences with an act that deftly manipulated them into thinking one thing was happening on stage before revealing what they were watching was something else entirely. No mere standup comic, Kaufman played with his audience in such a way that could be described as interactive performance art. And of all of Kaufman’s bits and characters that could be described as “interactive” none were more so than lounge singer Tony Clifton.

Born out of the tales that Kaufman’s writing partner Bob Zmuda told him about a former employer, Tony Clifton was the distillation of every bad story that ever circulated about any 1960s lounge entertainer. An abrasive loudmouth armed with bad one-liners and an even worse singing voice, Clifton was the guy who clearly forgot to leave his ego in the wings but would bring it out on stage with him to hilariously disastrous results. Decked out in oversized sunglasses and a rumpled peach tuxedo, Clifton was frequently downright abusive to his audience, loudly berating them when they didn’t recognize and show appreciation for his obvious “talents.” He’s a character through which Kaufman savagely deconstructed celebrity in both how it can affect performers and how audiences react to its presence.

Once in the Clifton makeup, Kaufman’s commitment was absolute. The ordinarily tee totaling vegetarian Kaufman would down thick steaks and slug back whiskey while in character. Backstage at comedy clubs, “Clifton” would snap at the other comics if they made the mistake of addressing him as “Andy.” Kaufman and Zmuda even convinced the producers of Taxi, the sitcom where cast member Kaufman got to invade millions of Americans’ homes with a variation of his Foreign Man character in the form of mechanic Latka Gravas, to hire Clifton for a guest starring role on the show. Needless to say, Clifton’s obnoxious behavior to the cast and crew had him physically thrown off the studio lot before the episode could be filmed. Once people began to get wise about the “connection” between Clifton and Kaufman, Andy had Zmuda learn how to play the role so Andy and Tony could appear on stage together.

It was only natural, then, that when Kaufman, Zmuda and their manager George Shapiro turned their thoughts of expanding Andy’s career into film, a larger than life character like Tony Clifton only seemed like a natural to take to the silver screen. Shapiro would secure the duo a deal with Universal Pictures based on the strength of a story outline and pitch put together by Kaufman and National Lampoon alumni Ed Bluestone, who conceived their famous “If You Don’t Buy This Magazine, We’ll Kill This Dog” cover. However, Bluestone balked at Kaufman’s insistence that Zmuda, as Clifton’s co-creator be included as a writer, and left the project. Kaufman and Zmuda then put their heads together and came up with a screenplay that would become one of the greatest and smartest comedies to never be committed to celluloid.

The film opens with Tony Clifton residing in Philadelphia where earns a living screwing the tops onto salt and pepper shakers in a factory. Although he paints himself as quite the Lothario to his co-workers, they secretly know better, but humor him in any case. One night, after a disastrous outing to a discothèque with some friends, he stumbles into a seedy massage parlor. Armed with a new found sense of confidence fueled by a cheap cologne called “Purple Passion” given to him by a mens room attendant, Tony orders the “deluxe” three hour massage and finds himself entertaining several of the working girls by singing lounge tunes while soaking in a Jacuzzi. The girls, in no small way influenced by the twenty dollar bills Tony is throwing around, compliment his singing. Finally, a sweet natured prostitute named Anna takes Clifton upstairs to a private room for the rest of his “massage,” where we are not too surprised to learn that up to that moment he is a virgin. The next day, Tony quits his assembly line job with visions of becoming a crooning superstar.

The screenplay then takes us across the country to Los Angeles, where up and coming comic Andy Kaufman is working at the Improvisation comedy club while his friend and writing partner Bob Zmuda is working in the club’s kitchen. Following a killer set, Kaufman is approached by agent George Shapiro who tells Andy that he can get him an audition for a sitcom. A quick six months later, Andy is a national star thanks to his work on Taxi. He is just starting a cross-country concert tour and has been reunited with his first childhood love- Marilyn Comstack. Unfortunately for Andy, Marilyn quickly becomes bored with accompanying him on his comedy tour and walks out on him in Philadelphia. Zmuda tries to cheer Kaufman up by taking him out to a bar where they encounter Clifton. Intrigued by Tony’s clearly awful stage act, in which he sings along with a juke box playing Sinatra’s “Come Blow Your Horn” (shades of Kaufman’s bit where he lip synchs the Mighty Mouse cartoon theme), Kaufman decides to book Clifton as his opening acting for his tour closing engagement at the Comedy Store in Los Angeles.

In Los Angeles, Andy introduces Tony Clifton as “the next Eighth Wonder of the World” and “my own personal discovery.” As expected, he bombs disastrously, with the police being called to disperse a crowd that is dangerously close to turn into an angry mob. Of course, this delights Kaufman and Zmuda to no end. Sensing that he has a tiger by the tail, Kaufman begins aggressively promoting Clifton and soon Clifton-mania sweeps the country. Clifton even becomes the subject of a 60 Minutes report by Mike Wallace and even performs at the White House for the President and a delegation of Chinese diplomats, with predictable disastrous results.

Even though he has become a huge overnight success, Tony is finding the whole experience more than a bit hollow. Andy notices, and after a heartfelt talk with Clifton, he flies the Philadelphia prostitute Anna to Los Angeles to keep his star’s spirits up. However, as the two spend time together, they fall in love. While watching a late night airing of The Hunchback Of Notre Dame, Clifton decides that he would like to move his career in a different direction, starting with a dramatic remake of Hunchback. Kaufman, of course, sees the possibility of further humiliating Clifton by making the film an unintentional comedy. What Kaufman doesn’t count on is Clifton deciding to walk off the film- not the remake of Hunchback of Notre Dame, but The Tony Clifton Story itself!

Much like Kaufman’s multilayered standup bit where his Foreign Man character delivers a dead on Elvis Presley impersonation, the third act of the script relays on several reversals of the audience’s expectations. After Clifton walks out of the production of his own film, Kaufman takes the screen to tell the audience that Clifton had passed away during shooting and that he, Kaufman, would step into the role of Clifton in order to finish the picture. But Clifton hasn’t died and his return is just one of several surprising twists and turns that make up the last section of the film.

Interestingly, for the purposes of the script, Kaufman seemingly has flipped personalities with the Clifton character, making himself the self-absorbed show business star warped by his own celebrity and making Clifton the kind-hearted person, even if he lacks in some if not most of the social graces. Was Kaufman perhaps expressing a fear of what his own celebrity could do to him? On a deeper level, since the script’s ultimate point of view is that of Clifton’s, we may doubt – as we are forced to do to several other story elements in the script – the reliability of the depiction of Clifton as good natured buffoon and Kaufman as Svengali by way of Elvis’ Col. Tom Parker. Once again Kaufman and Zmuda have played with the audiences expectations and perceptions, leaving the reader (and the theater-goers for whom the film was intended for) laughing in surprise and questioning the reality of all that has transpired. After all the trouble that Kaufman and Zmuda put into presenting the Clifton character to the world as a complete strutting ass, would they dare suggest that Tony has a warm and fuzzy sentimental side? And would the public buy it? It feels almost audacious that they would even attempt such a move, but in the script, it works.

Zmuda reports in his book Andy Kaufman: Revealed that while Universal executives were very excited about the script, there was some concern over Kaufman himself, as he was an unknown film prospect. This, despite his voluminous television work appearing on Saturday Night Live, David Letterman and numerous other talk shows and the popularity of his character Latka, a reiteration of his Foreign Man character, on the sit-com Taxi. Kaufman’s only previous film appearance of note was in comic Marty Feldman’s colossal bomb In God We Tru$t (1980). Although Kaufman was only hired to act in the movie (he shared representation with Feldman) and had no creative role in the film, he still wound up tainted by its dismal reception. Cautious Universal executives arranged for Kaufman to star opposite Bernadette Peters in the science-fiction comedy Heartbeeps to test how well he could be counted on to carry a film. Zmuda, having read a copy of the script, pleaded with Kaufman not to make the film, realizing that if it bombed the way he felt it was going to, their chance to make The Tony Clifton Story would evaporate as well. In a rare moment, Kaufman ignored the advice of his friend and went ahead and accepted the role of a robot who falls in love with another robot (Peters). Unfortunately, the movie proved to be a box office disaster and in quick order Universal cancelled any plans to make The Tony Clifton Story and Kaufman and Zmuda were asked to leave the studio lot.

(Bill Zehme, in his book Lost In The Funhouse: The Life And Mind Of Andy Kaufman, reports that The Tony Clifton Story script would undergo several revisions before the film was cancelled, ultimately transmuting the evil Andy Kaufman manager character into an evil manager named Norman who would consign both Kaufman and Clifton to a mental asylum.)

In final analysis, it’s easy to conclude that, barring some horrible production disaster, Kaufman and Zmuda’s original script would have yielded a comic masterpiece. True, addressing the audience or “breaking the fourth wall” was not a new concept in movies- Buster Keaton did it in Sherlock Jr. (1924) as did the comedy team of Olsen and Johnson in 1941‘s Hellzapoppin’. Bob Hope and Groucho Marx also have had numerous cinematic moments were they’d face the camera and comment directly to the audience on a scene’s action. Even James Bond, in the form of George Lazenby, infamously turned to the audience and commented “This never happened to the other fellow,” after losing a girl to another man in the opening moments of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969). Even less than a decade after the script was written, the television show Moonlighting was utilizing the concept of “breaking the fourth wall” regularly.

But despite the familiarity of the concept, Kaufman and Zmuda managed to bring something new to the concept, twisting the fourth wall breakage back on itself in a funhouse mirror reflection. Is the real Tony Clifton alive or dead? What’s reality and what’s a movie? Does it really matter though? As Tony says to the audience at the climax of the film’s grandiose musical finale – in which everybody gets a happy ending, including Kaufman who is reunited with Marilyn Comstack – “If I made just one person happy it’s all been worth it.”

One interesting postscript- After Clifton walks off the film and Andy takes tells the audience that he died, one should take special note of the “details” of Clifton’s passing- at Cedar Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles from cancer. Only five years after Kaufman wrote that scene, he himself passed away in Cedar Sinai Hospital from lung cancer. A coincidence? Or was Andy, as some conspiracy-minded fans would have it, already setting up what would be his greatest prank ever- faking his own death. Either way, with Universal passing on making Kaufman’s and Zmuda’s The Tony Clifton Story, the world lost its chance for one more great Kaufman performance.

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

New GRINDHOUSE Trailer!

Posted on 16 February 2007 by Rich Drees

While it is supposed to officially debut tomorrow simultaneously on television during CW’s WWE Friday Night Smackdown! and the Sci-FI Channel’s Special Unit 2 and in theatres running in front of screenings of Ghost Rider, Yahoo has let slip the new trailer for Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez’s Grindhouse out a little early.

You can view it on Yahoo here.

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

ACROSS THE UNIVERSE Trailer

Posted on 12 February 2007 by Rich Drees

Sometimes I anticipate films for what I’m sure others would think are odd reasons.

Case in point: director Julie Tambor’s Across The Universe, due out next year.

I know Beatles fans who are anxious to see how a movie musical could be put together using the using the vast catalog of Lennon/McCartney tunes available. A friend of mine who has enjoyed Tambor’s two previous films, Titus (1999) and Frida (2002) has mentioned how he can’t wait to see the director try her hands at a musical.

But for myself, I was first intrigued by the project when I heard that the screenwriters were Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais, whom worked on one of my favorite British television series, Lovejoy. I was familiar with some of their other work – loads of British television, Tracey Ullman’s mid-90s American series Tracey Takes On… , the 2005 soccer film Goal! and of course, the 1991 hit The Commitments. Weird, I know, but sometimes it’s the writer, the one usually so abused by the film production process, that draws me to a specific film.

However, once I saw the trailer for the film, I went from being interested in seeing it, to nearly salivating with anticipation. The trailer is amazingly cut and seems to showcase visuals that are at times gritty and other times psychedelic, but always seem to capture the mood and tone of the changes that society went through in the 1960s, changes reflected in the Beatles own music.

Across The Universe is currently scheduled to open on September 28. And while there are a lot of fun blockbusters to tide me over through the summer months, this prospect of seeing this film by the time autumn roles around will not be far from my mind.

Comments (0)

Tags:

The Trouble With Lists

Posted on 07 February 2007 by Rich Drees

Well, I guess I can die then…

The Houston Chronicle’s tech writer, Dwight Silverman, has posted on his blog a list of 15 films he considers essential film geek watching. Not surprisingly, I’ve seen all films on the list.

I’d also have to say that I’m not that impressed with his choices overall. Sure, I’ve enjoyed every film named to one degree or another and 12 of the titles sit on my DVD shelf at home. But Silverman’s list is an awfully narrow slice of science-fiction, fantasy and horror genre films that arguably are pretty well known to the general public. I mean really, two Star Trek films? Even a die-hard Terry Gilliam fan like myself is wondering at the inclusion of 3 of his films. Likewise, Sam Raimi gets two of his films named to the list with Silverman even admitting that Army Of Darkness is “a more mainstream and approachable film” than the first two Evil Dead flicks. How, exactly, can a movie be both “mainstream and approachable” and worthy of being placed on a list of “geek films”? It seems to me that the two are mutually exclusive.

In an effort to provide some more geek film titles for his readers, Silverman also links to another blog that contains the title of 81 geek movies “that do not suck.” While this new list does traffic in roughly the same science-fiction/fantasy/horror milieu that Silverman’s list, it does deserve some credit for trying to expand things a bit with the addition of the “Obsessive Nerd-Chick Stalker Geek,” “Cult Film Geek” and “Nostalgia “I was a nerd kid in the 80s” Geek” categories.

But still the list is problematic. There are a few titles – An Evening With Kevin Smith and Children Of Dune – which aren’t films but made for DVD specials or television mini-series. There also seems to be a lot of padding on this list- naming both Spider-Man films, four separate Star Trek films (though the original Star Wars trilogy gets grouped as one entry), and films like Constantine and Swordfish. Swordfish?!

Ultimately, while both lists attempt to be something that starts discussions among film fans (See, we’re doing it here), they fail in that their scope is limited to however the writer chooses to define “film geek.” In both instances here, the writers clearly think that geekdom (Geekatude? Geekosity?) is clearly confined to a few narrow genres. But what about those people whose unabidding love is the movie musical or westerns or silents? Don’t they get their geek lists too?

No art can be judged in a vacuum and if one only exposed themselves to films considered “classics,” one would rapidly loose any standard by which to judge said films. It’s much better to have knowledge of a wide range of films from all genres in order to be able to better appreciate any movie they may watch. Soderberg’s recent The Good German invariably invites the viewer to draw comparisons to Casablanca. But how are those comparisons tempered when the viewer also factors in the Pam Anderson film Barb Wire, which also drew inspiration from the Humphrey Bogart classic?

I’ve always tried to steer clear of “Best Of” or “Essential” lists here at FilmBuffOnLine. It’s not that I’m afraid that someone is going to disagree with my choices. It’s that there are too many choices to narrow a list down to manageable levels. That’s why if pressed for a list of movies that one absolutely must watch by friends or family, I always answer “As many as you can.”

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Howard Stern – MAN OF THE YEAR?

Posted on 01 February 2007 by Rich Drees

Yesterday, while discussing the movie offers he has received over the years in the wake of his 1997 autobiographical Private Parts, talk radio icon Howard Stern mentioned that he was in talks with director Barry Levinson to star in last year’s political satire Man Of The Year, with Stern in the lead role that was eventually taken by Robin Williams as a political satirist who runs for the highest office in the land. It was announcement that brought to mind visions of his 1994 aborted run for New York governor.

Ultimately, Stern turned down the project despite expressing a desire to really want to work with director Barry Levinson. At the time, Stern was making the move from his FCC-hampered terrestrial radio gig to his new home at Sirius Satellite radio and felt that Sirius deserved his full creative energies at the moment. He also mentioned that he felt the script could have used some punching-up and that he had some ideas in that direction. Unfortunately, Levinson was intent on shooting as soon as possible and couldn’t wait the few months that Stern needed to get to a point where he could concentrate on the film.

What made yesterday’s revelation interesting is that while Stern has mentioned receiving film offers in the past, he has only gone into this amount of detail about these offers once before. Following the release of Private Parts, Stern was set to play the supporting role of a record company executive in the Melanie Griffith project Jane. David Spade was cast as Stern’s character’s assistant. Preproduction on the film had gotten as far as wardrobe fittings before a portion of the funding fell through, resulting in a rescheduled shoot that Stern wasn’t available for. When he dropped out of the project, the rest of the funding for the film fell apart and it was never made.

What isn’t surprising is Stern’s insistence of a re-write of Man Of The Year’s script, especially if the draft he was concerned about is the same one Levinson shot with Williams. Stern has a record of being demanding when it comes to screenplays. The script for Private Parts was in development for nearly three years and had reportedly gone through several writers, including Peter Torokvei (Real Genius, Guarding Tess) before Len Blum and Michael Kalesniko delivered a draft that he approved. Other projects that Stern has announced in the past as developing have also stalled out in the scripting phase.

Comments (2)