Archive | March, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Paul WS Anderson To Ruin BUCK ROGERS In 3D

Posted on 25 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Buck RogersHack director Paul WS Anderson has landed the job of directing a 3D adaptation of the classic comic strip adventure hero Buck Rogers. Anderson’s previous crimes against humanity and cinema include the 1995 Mortal Kombat, Event Horizon, Soldier and the first Alien Vs. Predator movie.

Iron Man writers Art Marcum and Matt Holloway are set to write the screenplay of a World War One veteran who goes into suspended animation in the 1920s and awakens 2419 in time to help fight to free America from an invasion from a foreign country. Buck Rogers has already had adventures in a 12-part serial starring Buster Crabbe, a radio series and two television series. Previously, Frank Miller had been attached to direct.

I have to admit that the character of Buck Rogers does hold a special place in my geek heart. In creator Philip Frances Nowlan’s original 1928 novella Armageddon 2419 AD, Buck was inspecting a mine in 1927 for the American Radioactive Gas Corporation when he was trapped in a cave-in and went into suspended animation for nearly five centuries. The mine was located in the Wyoming Valley, a section of the northeast corner of Pennsylvania and which houses the cities of Wilkes-Barre and Scranton. It also happens to be the region where I spent much of my adolescence and from where FilmBuffOnline is based. (The daily comic strip which would appear a year later would change the mine’s location to near Pittsburgh.)

Via Deadline.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Robert Culp Has Died

Posted on 24 March 2010 by William Gatevackes

Actor Robert Culp has been found dead today after hitting his head after a fall outside his home according to The Insider. Culp was 79.

Culp was primarily known as a television actor, appearing in a variety of anthologies and guest appearances dating back to the early 1950s. However, he is most known for two works. He is known for his role as Agent Kelly Robinson in the groundbreaking I Spy series, which ran from 1965 to 1968 and was adapted for the big screen in 2002 as an Eddie Murphy and Owen Wilson vehicle. He also received a good amount of geek cred for his role as FBI agent Bill Maxwell in the cult superhero hit The Greatest American Hero, which ran from 1981 to 1986 and also is in line for a move to the big screen.

But Culp also had a film career. His most notable film work is the 1969 sex comedy, Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice. He also played a number of supporting roles later in his career, usually as an authority figure, most notably as Mayor Tyler in 1985′s Turk 182 and the President of the United States in 1993′s The Pelican Brief.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Brooks Starting Work On BLAZING SADDLES Musical

Posted on 24 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Throw out your hands! Stick out your tush!
Hands on your hips! Give them a push!

Not content with having turned two of his films in to Broadway shows, comedy legend Mel Brooks is preparing a third, this time using his classic 1974 Western spoof Blazing Saddles as the basis. Reportedly he has already penned two songs for the proposed show and is working on a third.

If you have somehow managed to get through life this long without seeing Blazing Saddles, get yourself to a video store, added it to your Netflix queue or just buy it from Amazon immediately. The film spoofs classic Hollywood westerns while not-so-subtly attacking racism as well. It is one of the funniest, silliest, smartest and sly subversive films made.

Brooks stated that he hopes to have the project completely written by next year. As of now, there are no other creative personnel attached, so the prospect of it hitting the boards is a bit of a ways off.

Via Playbill.

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

Kevin Smith Shooting RED STATE Before HIT SOMEBODY

Posted on 23 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Kevin Smith has long been talking about his planned Red State project, a horror film which he has described as “so bleak that it makes The Dark Knight look like Strawberry Shortcake.” Unfortunately, he has had a hard time funding the project, but it now looks as if he has the cash to go ahead with production. The director announced yesterday via his Twitter feed that he will begin production later this summer on the film-

I talk about lots of stuff I wanna do that either happens years later or never happens at all. Happy to report RED STATE is not the latter… First draft was dated 9/5/07. Looks like we start shooting this July. Took nearly three years, but we’re finally gonna roll on RED.

Smith has previously stated that the villain of the piece was inspired by the Westboro Baptist Church leader and hate-monger Fred Phelps.

Following the wrap of Red State, Smith will go into production on his hockey movie Hit Somebody, with star Sean William Scott.

Although it fared poorly with critics and did only moderate business at the box office, Smith said via Twitter his work on the recently released Cop Out, the first film he has directed that wasn’t from one of his own scripts, was helpful in getting Red State going forward. However, he does state that the film will be done interdependently. The film will not be so much a slasher or “torture porn” movie but “tonally closer to Race With The Devil or Deliverance.”

Also, Smith warned people not to expect Jay and Silent Bob – the two bumbling dope peddlers who have appeared in a number of Smith’s films played by himself and Jason Mewes – to show up in Red State. That would “Be like Kermit & Fozzie cameo-ing in Ordinary People: just waaaaay out of place.”

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Malkovich And McDormand Cast In TRANSFORMERS 3

Posted on 22 March 2010 by Rich Drees

You know how every now and then you read about a prestigious actor taking a role in a movie you would think a bit beneath their prestige? This is one of those stories.

Two-time Academy Award nominee John Malkovich and three-time Academy Award nominee and one-time Oscar winner Frances McDormand have been hired to appear in Michael Bay’s giant robots fighting and exploding sequel Transformers 3. According to Deadline, Malkovich will be playing franchise star Shia LaBeouf’s character’s first boss while McDormand will be playing the National Intelligence Director.

So is Bay aiming for a higher caliber film, with quality actors and a quality script? This is a Transformers film, so I’m not holding my breath. Hopefully, Malkovich and McDormand have something worthwhile to spend their paychecks on.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Chris Evans Will Throw CAPTAIN AMERICA’s Mighty Shield

Posted on 22 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Well that was quick.

At the start of last weekend, it was reported that Chris Evans had been offered the role of Captain America for Marvel Studios’ upcoming comic book adaptation, even though his both the actor’s and Marvel’s reps weren’t commenting. The new week has just barely begun and it has been officially announced that he has accepted.

Some “i”s are still be dotted and “t”s being crossed, but Evans is set to start filming the movie with director Joe Johnston in just a few short months. The contract will also lock him in to appearing in eighth other Marvel films including 2012′s The Avengers.

Competition for the role was rather stiff with the studio’s reported short list including the likes of John Krasinski, Scott Porter, Mike Vogel, Michael Cassidy, Patrick Flueger, Chace Crawford and Garret Hedlund.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

And CAPTAIN AMERICA May Be…

Posted on 20 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Chris Evans.

The Hollywood Reporter is reporting that Marvel Studios has put out an offer to Evans to play the star-spangled hero in their upcoming comic book adaptation. Expectedly, both the studio and Evan’s reps have declined to comment.

It is speculated that the deal will be similar to the commitment that Samuel Jackson signed to appear as spymaster Nick Fury over nine Marvel films. Beyond the Captain America film set for release in 2011, it is known that the hero would appear in 2012 superhero team-up film The Avengers. That would leave seven other films that Evans could appear in from a Captain America or Avengers sequel to small appearances in another character’s films helping with the cross-pollination of Marvel’s cinematic superhero universe.

But Evans has a lot on his plate right now. He will currently be seen in The Losers next month and Scott Pilgrim Versus the World later this year, both comic book adaptations. The Losers very likely has a sequel clause and Evans has already appeared as a superhero in 20th Century Fox’s two Fantastic Four films. Evans may decide that he doesn’t want his career to become one just of comic book films.

I can’t say that I’m overly enthused with the possibility of Evans’ casting. I am not a fan of the Fantastic Four films and really didn’t like his smirky performance in them. The role of Captain America requires some big time gravitas and will require its actor to share screen time with the likes of Robert Downey Jr. and Sam Jackson and almost command attention away from them. Evans hasn’t really demonstrated that ability to me yet. Not helping my feelings of unease is the report that Evans didn’t even screen test for the role. But so far Marvel Studios has pretty much made all the right moves with the superhero films, so I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Captain America: The First Avenger is set to begin filming this summer for a release in 2011.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Review: THE RUNAWAYS

Posted on 20 March 2010 by Rich Drees

The history of rock and roll is littered with bands who briefly burned bright and fierce, momentarily capturing the public’s attention before flaming out equally as fast, and as quickly forgotten. Many of their stories chart similar courses, flavored by the various participants involved. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell if the tale of the Los Angeles group of rock and roll Lolitas, the Runaways, is interesting or not, because the new movie chronicling their meteoric rise and equally swift fall can’t seem to decide what story it wants to tell.

The Runaways is a rambling affair, never quite settling on what it wants to be the focus of its story. Is it interested in the story of band? Guitarist and co-founder Joan Jett? Lead singer Cherie Currie? Jett’s and Currie’s friendship? It tried to be a bit of each at various times, but the end result is definitely less than the sum of its parts. Presumably, the movie is supposed to be about Currie, as it is based on her memoir Neon Angel. Strictly speaking, Currie seems to get the most screen time and we see the effects of quick fame on her the most. But if this is to be the rock and roll cautionary tale it suggests it is at time, why do we only see the negative side of the girls’ hard partying and drug use impacting only Currie when we are shown Jett living it up just as hard?

The film’s title, however, would lead one to believe it is the story of the whole band which it definitely is not. As a document about the whole band, the movie fails dramatically. After their introduction, the other three girls in the group are quickly regulated into the background, nothing more than glorified extras. They only re-emerge for the few times when the script needs them to heighten the drama and tensions between everyone. Jett gets more screen time than a supporting character usually does, but the part doesn’t seem to be quite as strong a presence in the film to be a true co-lead. It feels as like the filmmakers wanted to tell Currie’s story, but pumped up the character of Jett just enough to help market the movie better.

Ultimately, it is the film’s lack of cohesion that makes it difficult to engage with anything happening on the screen.

Despite its haphazard organization, the film gives plenty of material for Dakota Fanning to draw from for her performance as Cherie. As Jett, Stewart manages to find a bit of life in an underdeveloped and underwritten character. (At least her time in the Twilight series has taught her something.) While we see much of Currie’s home life which drives her character, we barely get a glimpse of Jett’s background.

The most interesting character turns out to be the theatrical and quite possibly just a bit crazy record producer Kim Fowley, the Svengali behind the band’s success. The always dependable and versatile Michael Shannon plays him with gusto, but stops just short of making him cartoony. Unfortunately, the character is not on screen enough to save the film or make it worth recommending.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Releases: March 19

Posted on 19 March 2010 by William Gatevackes

1. Diary Of A Wimpy Kid (FOX, 3,077 Theaters, 120 Minutes, Rated PG): When I looked towards 2010 as a fan of the comic book movie, I thought it would be a rather light year. Too my surprise, it will be a pretty full year for graphic novel adaptations. And it all starts off this week.

Granted, Diary of a Wimpy Kid isn’t a normal comic books. It exists only as a series of hardcover, kid-friendly graphic novels. But it follows the same rules as the comic book and is enormously popular. So I’m going to count it.

The story focuses on the adventures of a middle school-aged kid who must deal with the torment of not being as popular as he’d like to be. He deals with his station in life by trying to rise above it and by writing sarcastic missives in his diary—er—journal.

If everything goes right, this might be the film that unseats Alice in Wonderland at the box office.

2. The Bounty Hunter (Sony/Columbia, 3,074 Theaters, 110 Minutes, Rated PG-13): Witness the strange case of Gerard Butler. He broke on the scene in the movie musical Phantom of the Opera. He became a star in the ultra-macho 300. Now he seems to be spending his career trying to appeal to audiences for both those films by playing a series of growling, manly action-ready characters in a series of rote and formulaic chick flicks.

Has it been working? Last year’s The Ugly Truth, in which he followed the same formula, was  lambasted by the critics (only 14% fresh at Rotten Tomatoes) but qualifies as a hit, especially overseas where it tripled its production budget.

This film, where Butler plays a bounty hunter hired to track down his ex-wife only to become embroiled in a plot against her life, seems to be just as awful as The Ugly Truth. He’s with Jennifer Aniston this time instead of Kathrine Heigl. Will that make a difference? We’ll see.

3. Repo Men (Universal, 2,522 Theaters, 111 Minutes, Rated R): This film can’t help but bring up memories of the 1984 film Repo Man. But one wishes that this film has some of the subversive satire of the other.

This film takes place in a future where human life is extended through artificial organs bought on credit. People who fall behind on payments can soon find their life-saving mechanical organs be repossessed.

Jude Law plays one of the best organ repo men around. He unfortunately has a cardiac incident and becomes a client of the corporation he works for. When he falls behind on payments, he has to fight for his life against other repo men like himself.

This film could have a lot of commentary about the current health care crisis gripping this country today. But it seem like the film devolves into a mindless actioner by the third act. Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s how the ads make it seem. 

Comments Off

Tags: , ,

Edison’s FRANKENSTEIN Turns 100 Today

Posted on 18 March 2010 by Rich Drees

Today marks the 100 anniversary of the release of cinema’s first horror film, an adaptation of Frankenstein from Thomas Edison’s Edison Studios. To mark the occasion, we’re re-presenting our look at the history of the film and how it was rediscovered after being thought lost forever.

One of the most sought after short films by fans of the silent era is the 1910 production of Frankenstein from Thomas Edison’s Edison Studios. For many years the only image thought to exist from the 15-minute feature was a single photo of wild haired, shambling monster grimacing at the camera. Fortunately, recent years have revealed that it’s not as lost as one would think.

Frankenstein was filmed at Edison Motion Picture Studios located on the corner of Decatur Avenue and Oliver Place in the Bronx, New York, one of several dozens pictures the studio produced that year. The studio was built between 1906 and 1907 in response to the growing demand for films. Edison had been the leading pioneer of first kinetoscopes and then projected motion pictures. His first film studio, located near his laboratories in Orange, New Jersey, was too inconvenient to the majority of actors based in New York City. A studio opened on the roof of a building on 25th Street in Manhattan proved too small to keep up with the demand. The Bronx location was designed to be a state of the art facility to handle all of the Edison Company’s production requirements. It’s proximity to the end of the recently constructed Third Avenue El subway system is believed to have been so actors could slip away to make films without attracting the attention of their peers who may have disapproved of participating in the new and vulgar medium.

By 1908, the studio was in full operation, putting out several short, one-reel films a week. The motion picture arm of Edison’s business was also quickly becoming its most profitable- pulling in $200,000 plus an additional $130,000 from the sale of projectors. Still, Edison was losing his grip on being the sole technological innovator for the new medium as more studios sprang into existence with legitimate rights to certain patents.

To combat the problem, in 1909 Edison and his lawyers approached nine of the other top studios with the plan to form The Motion Picture Patents Company, commonly known as The Trust, to share patents, pool resources and keep control over everything from the manufacture of production equipment like cameras to film production itself. The Trust then set up the General Film Company to buy out the 52 leading film distributors, just so they could control the distribution of their films. Theatre owners were forced into paying a $2 a week fee for the rights to screen Trust films. (Never mind the fact that Edison’s company was earning almost a million dollars a year on from the other Trust members through patent royalties.)

As the popularity of motion pictures grew, so did the attention they received from moral crusaders and reform groups, who decried the new medium as being dangerous and encouraging of immorality. Some called for strict laws governing film content and some communities banned theatres all together. Knowing that these groups could pose a serious threat to his bottom line, Edison ordered that not only the production quality of his films be improved, but also their moral tone. The Trust even set up the first Board of Censors, consisting of film executives and religious and education leaders.

Frankenstein was the perfect choice to kick off production under this new moral banner. It’s a story that deals with the extremes of the human condition, life and death, and the dangers of tampering in God’s realm. Plus, Edison made sure that publicity stressed that some of the more sensational elements of the Mary Shelly’s novel had been toned down. The March 15, 1910 edition of The Edison Kinetogram, the catalog that the Edison Company would send to distributors to hype their new films, described the film as such-

To those familiar with Mrs. Shelly’s story it will be evident that we have carefully omitted anything which might be any possibility shock any portion of the audience. In making the film the Edison Co. has carefully tried to eliminate all actual repulsive situations and to concentrate its endeavors upon the mystic and psychological problems that are to be found in this weird tale. Wherever, therefore, the film differs from the original story it is purely with the idea of eliminating what would be repulsive to a moving picture audience.

One of those changes made to the narrative concerns the creation of Frankenstein’s monster. While Shelly’s novel did not go into specifics about the monster’s creation, the creation scene in the film certainly owes more to alchemy than science. The film certainly didn’t stress the danger of unchecked scientific experimentation, not when the boss has transformed the world with his own scientific marvels. Instead, the monster is cast more as a reflection of Frankenstein’s baser instincts and dark reflection of a mind that presumed to meddle in God’s domain.

The part of the monster was portrayed by Charles Ogle. He joined the Edison Stock Company Players in 1909 and had essayed parts as far ranging as Scrooge in a 1910 production of A Christmas Carol to George Washington in a series of films on the history of the United States. Since actors at the time were responsible for their own wardrobe and makeup, Ogle was probably the one who developed the monster’s shambling appearance, perhaps inspired by drawings of how actor Thomas Porter Cooke looked for an 1823 English Opera House stage production of the novel called Presumption or the Fate of Frankenstein.

Edison Stock Company Player Augustus Phillips was chosen to portray the role of the monster’s creator Frankenstein. Very little is known about this actor beyond the films that he made at Edison and then Columbia Pictures. He continued to make features into the early `20s at Pathe, Metro and Goldwyn studios.

Rounding out the cast is Mary Fuller as Frankenstein’s fiancée Elizabeth, though she is never referred to by name in the film. She had joined the Edison Stock Company Players in 1909 and would ultimately appear in a reported over 500 productions, often with Charles Ogle. She was also one of the first motion picture stars to receive an on screen credit in 1911 for her lead role in Aida.

The film’s director was J. (James) Searle Dawley and had started at Edison as a writer in 1907. He was soon apprenticed to director Edwin S. Porter who had shot the landmark The Great Train Robbery in 1903. A quick study, Dawley was soon directing his own films at Edison within a year. Stylistically, Dawley was the antithesis of Porter though. Porter is generally credited with the development of much of the language of cinema including matched edited shots and the close up. Dawley preferred to shoot each scene as if it were a play, with the camera stoically removed from the action.

As director of the film, Dawley was responsible for personally overseeing every aspect of the production from writing the script to approving the set construction and Ogle’s makeup design. In this respect his job was more synonymous with what both a producer and a director would do today. He was only answerable to studio head Horace Plimpton. As was the case with most of his films, it is assumed that Dawley wrote the scenario for the film himself. It is unknown whether Edison himself encouraged or approved the production at its start as he made only rare appearances at the Bronx studio. More than likely, the go ahead was given by the Studios managers, making sure that the script would conform to the decrees of the Trust’s Censor Board.

The film opens with Frankenstein leaving to study at University, bidding goodbye to his sweetheart. Two years pass and Frankenstein has finished his contemplation of the mysteries of nature and seems ready to try his own hand at God’s work. However, his attempt at creating life goes awry, with a hulking, twisted creature emerging from the alchemical vat. Aghast at his creation, Frankenstein returns home to marry his fiancée and escape his mistake. But the creature follows him and confronts his creator, tormenting him. But, as the film’s final title character tell us, the creature “is overcome by love and disappears” into a mirror in Frankenstein’s study.

Most films were shot in a day, but due to the special effects work involved Frankenstein’s production lasted nearly a week, stretching from some time between January 13, 1910 to January 19, 1910. (What little records survive are unclear. It is known the Dawley was out of the country filming in Cuba by January 19th. Some sources state that studio head Plimpton approved the film’s scenario on January 14th.) The film was completed and sent over to the Orange County, New Jersey offices for approval on January 28th and received that approval on February 1st. Over the next two weeks, musical accompaniment was picked and certain scenes were run through a stenciling machine to be tinted.

Edison had pioneered the idea of tinting films to add color in 1884. Edison Studio’s Annabelle the Dancer, featuring music hall performer Annabelle Moore recreating her stage act “The Butterfly Dance,” was one of the first commercially projected motion pictures and was first exhibited at the Cotton States Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia in mid-September 1885. Since her act used a projection of colored stereopticon slides as she danced with long silk draperies, Edison touched on the idea to have prints of the film hand painted frame by frame, in the same manner that some photographs and portraits were tinted at the time. By 1910, tinting of films had become common, with blue often being used for night scenes, green for woodland scenes and so on.

In the second half of February, the film was assembled with each scene was pasted together to form a complete print. In early March, Edison Studios copyrighted the picture and submitted paper prints of several scenes to the Library of Congress. In a cost cutting measure started right before the turn of the century, the studio had begun to have a positive print of each film developed on sheets of paper instead of actual film prints for submission for copyright. (The studio would later switch to paper rolls.) That a number of Edison films that have survived did so mainly through the existence of these paper prints. Currently, the Library of Congress only has selected scenes from Frankenstein, not a whole copy.

The film premiered on Friday, March 18, 1910, a mere two months after it had finished shooting. Such a quick turnaround was not uncommon at the time. There was great demand for films and the week of Frankenstein’s release there were over 30 films released by Trust members. The film was received favorably by critics. The New York Dramatic Mirror in a review published on 3/26/10 stated “This deeply impressive story makes a powerful film subject, and the Edison players have handled it with effective expression and skill.”

However, Frankenstein did not generally do well with audiences. There are several possible reasons that may have contributed to its less than stellar reception. Frankenstein was the first horror movie and audiences possibly weren’t sure what to make of this weird story. Moving pictures were already becoming more sophisticated with the use of close-ups and editing within a scene becoming more common. It’s possible that audiences found director Dawley’s stage-y, wide shots to be old fashioned.

It has also been reported that in some communities there was objections to the film due to its perceived blasphemous content. Debates were ongoing around the country over Darwinism and a film that could be seen as mocking the creative power of God was sure to draw fire from the pulpit. Regardless of the reasons, the film made its distribution rounds and was then withdrawn from circulation. While some films like 1903’s The Great Train Robbery remained popular and in circulation for years, Frankenstein quickly faded from the public’s minds.

At the time, Edison Studios would only strike approximately 40 prints of each of their productions, which would then be sent out for distribution. After the films had circulated for seven months or so, they were returned where they were stripped for their silver content. The films were quickly forgotten by the studio and the public and no thought was given to any future value they may hold. That even a handful of Edison Studios films still exist on celluloid is only due to the efforts of private collectors.

And the fact that just a single print of Edison Studio’s Frankenstein still exists is all due to one Wisconsin film collector, Alois Felix Dettlaff Sr., and a little bit of luck. The print in his possession had originally belonged to his wife’s grandmother who used to screen it along with a silent version of Hiawatha. As he relates in Frederick C. Wiebel Jr’s self-published book Edison’s Frankenstein, “She dressed up as an Indian and danced on the stage, and she had short subjects along with it, and one of them was Frankenstein.”

However, the film would take a roundabout way to Dettlaff’s possession. After his wife’s grandmother left show business, she passed her film collection and projector to her son, who in turn passed them on to his son, Dettlaff’s brother-in-law. Not knowing what he had in the collection, Dettlaff’s brother-in-law sold the entire collection to a film collector, who then sold it to another collector of Dettlaff’s acquaintance, from whom Dettlaff purchased them in the mid 1950s. Since he was running silent films for his children as a way of teaching them to read, he did screen the film. However, noting that the film had some wear and tear, and about 8% shrinkage due to age, he placed the print aside, so as not to damage it further.

It was in 1963 that a film historian discovered the March 15, 1910 edition of The Edison Kinetogram with its picture of Charles Ogle in full make up on its cover in the Edison archives in New Jersey. The picture was published in numerous magazines and books, sparking interest among film buffs worldwide. But no print could be found. In 1980, the American Film Institute declared the 1910 production of Frankenstein to be one of the top ten most “Culturally and historically significant lost films.”

When Dettlaff heard of the film’s placement on the AFI’s list, he announced that he had indeed had a copy. However, knowing the worth of such a treasure, Dettlaff has been reticent about releasing the film to be seen. In the late 1970s he had allowed a few minutes to be shown as part of a BBC documentary, later released to home video. These snippets would later wind up in various silent cinema video compilations without attribution or payment made to Dettlaff. Feeling slighted and perhaps not appreciated for his archival efforts, Dettlaff has been guarded in allowing the film to be screened. In 1986, he donated a “copyright protected” version of the film, with a copyright notice that scrolled across the center of the film making viewing difficult, to the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. He has also reportedly made numerous safety copies of the film on 16 and 35 mm.

In 1975, at the urging of TV news photographer Charles Sciurba, Dettlaff undertook making a copy of the film with the aid of Clarence Stelloh, who had worked as an engineer at Western Electric during the early days of sound film. Working over several weekends, the pair used a 16mm camera and a modified step printer to copy some 14,000 to 15,000 images at a rate of one to two frames a second to create a 16mm backup copy of the film. Complicating the project was the fact that the film had shrunk by up to 8% at some spots, necessitating Stelloh to make changes to the printer to accommodate for the varying space between the sprocket holes.

Detlaff held the first public screening of Frankenstein in decades on October 30, 1993 at the Avalon Theater in his hometown of Milwaukee. It was the first of several annual screenings at various venues in the city. In April 2003, Dettlaff screened the film at the Landmark Loew’s Jersey Theatre in Jersey City, New Jersey as part of a weekend long festival of Frankenstein films. Both evenings’ shows were packed with people curious to see the fifteen-minute short that has so captured the imaginations of film buffs through just one frame. The screening was also used to launch the film’s release on DVD, available from Dettlaff’s own A. D. Ventures, International.

Comments (1)