Archive | July, 2011

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Review: CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE.

Posted on 31 July 2011 by William Gatevackes

Whether its the fact that Crazy, Stupid, Love.‘s star-crossed lovers who can’t seem to get together because of who they are, the mix of heart-wrenching dramatics with near slapstick humor, or the many cases where just the right song from unknown indie band or a deep album cut from a popular band scores the moment on screen perfectly, this film reminds me of late 80s, early 90s Cameron Crowe.

I’m not saying this is a bad thing, unless, of course, you can’t stand Crowe’s output from Say Anything to Jerry Maguire. I happen to like those films and when that style works, as it does here, I think it makes for an entertaining film.

The movie begins with Cal (Steve Carell) being asked for a divorce by his wife, Emily (Julianne Moore). The couple were childhood sweethearts, and were married at 17, so Cal is ill-prepared to enter the dating scene. Luckily, he catches the eye of Jacob (Ryan Gosling), a young pick-up artist who’s a hit with the ladies. Jacob helps Cal find his inner mojo, but will it be enough so Cal can win Emily back? Does he even want to? And what kind of complications arise when the player finally finds the one girl he want to spend all of his time with in the quirky Hannah (Emma Stone).

There’s a lot to like about this film. It’s a well constructed movie with many carefully crafted scenes that involve the audience. It is perfectly cast, with every actor playing their roles to perfection. Granted, you have Steve Carell playing a sad sack, a role he can do in his sleep, but I never pictured Ryan Gosling as being that much of a ladies man before this film, but I do know. Especially good are Kevin Bacon and Marisa Tomei in glorified cameos. Their work in this film is proof of the adage that there are no small part, only small actors. Both light up the screen whenever the show up. Bacon plays what could easily be the villain of the piece but makes the character geeky and human. And Tomei goes from needy and vulnerable to righteously angry without ever falling into parody.

The writing is great as well, as Dan Fogelman is brave enough to use foreshadowing without drawing too much attention to it. There is quite a big reveal during the third act that was set up in the preceding scenes yet still caught me by surprise. The dialogue always sounds realistic and the plot point always ring true, even when the film finds its way into out and out farce in the third act.

There are a lot of great moments in the film, a lot of great characterization and a lot of great writing in the film. It’s a good alternative to the summer blockbuster.

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , ,

Trailer Park: RED TAILS And TOWER HEIST

Posted on 29 July 2011 by Rich Drees

A couple of trailers hit the web today. One is a project that producer George Lucas has been trying to get made for some time, the tale of the Tuskegee Airmen in World War Two Red Tails. The other may just mark Eddie Murphy’s long overdue return to being funny in films. (I only say “may,” as the director of Tower Heist is Brett Ratner whose films I do laugh at, though not always for the reasons he would wish I would be laughing.)

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

Gilliam Writing Screenplay Adaption Of Novel ‘Mr. Vertigo’

Posted on 29 July 2011 by Rich Drees

Terry GilliamIt can be heartbreaking being a Terry Gilliam fan. For whatever reason, the visionary director often has trouble securing financing for his films and even when he does, there can still be problems that keep him from getting a project made (see Lost in LaMancha).

So it’s with a dash of caution in my optimism that I report that Gilliam is currently working on a screenplay for a new film, an adaptation of Paul Auster’s novel Mr. Vertigo.

According to The Real Gilliam Fan, the director was at Era New Horizons Film Festival in Poland doing and Question & Answer session and revealed –

I got a book. It’s called ‘Mr. Vertigo’ by Paul Auster. And I’m actually working on a script of it at the moment. Doesn’t mean it will be a film; but I’m working on a script.

You have to admire Gilliam’s self-deprecating sense of humor.

I have to admit that I am not all that familiar with Auster as a novelist. I do know that he collaborated with Wayne Wang on the stories for the films The Center Of The World, Smoke and Blue In The Face and helped with the direction of the latter two films as well.

From the description of the plot on Wikipedia, it does sound like a story that could be right up Gilliam’s alley -

It tells the story of a young orphaned boy from St. Louis, Walter Claireborne Rawley, who happens upon a mysterious traveler known only as Master Yehudi. Master Yehudi trains Walter to fly and they begin traveling across the United States performing this feat at circus sideshows. Many times they are faced with hardships such as the Ku Klux Klan, the Chicago Mob, and Walter’s drunken uncle, Slim.

Why am I picturing a film that looks like Gilliam had directed Big Fish? We’ll see if this project comes to fruition.

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

ENTOURAGE Producers Hoping For Film Continuation

Posted on 29 July 2011 by Rich Drees

If you’ve been hoping for an Entourage film to continue the adventures of rising actor Vincent Chase (Adrian Grenier) and his friends once the popular HBO series finishes up this fall, you’re not alone. The producers of the show would like to see the series make the jump to the big screen as well. There’s just a few small details standing in the way, like a story idea and financing.

At a Television Critics Association press tour event for Entourage’s eighth and final season executive producer Mark Wahlberg stated –

If I had to finance it myself, I would do it… I’ve been telling [creator/executive producer] Doug Ellin, The Hangover is to me very much like Entourage, and look at all the recent success of R-rated movies.

Ellin was even more positive that an Entourage film would come to pass -

We’re going to do a movie. We’re going to do it, the questing is when and how quickly. Hopefully we’ll come down with an idea and make it happen.

While I admire their optimism, it sounds as if they’ve an awful lot of hurdles to clear before a potential film would be close to becoming a reality. Of course, they probably known this and are just making some more noise that they hope will generate more press to hype the show’s concluding season. If that’s the case, then mission accomplished.

Via Deadline.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Kirby Lawsuit Decided In Favor Of Marvel Comics

Posted on 29 July 2011 by William Gatevackes

Deadline Hollywood revealed yesterday that the Federal Court for the Southern District Of New York has granted summary judgements asked for by Marvel and denied the Jack Kirby Estate’s cross request for summary judgements in their lawsuit against many rights holders of Kirby co-creations. What this means, basically, that the courts say that Kirby’s work for Marvel was “work-for-hire” (Marvel’s claim) and therefore the Kirby estate has no right to terminate their copyright (The estate’s claim was that they could).

As we reported here back in 2009, The Kirby Estate sent notices of copyright termination to 45 entities, including Marvel, Disney, Sony Pictures, Universal Pictures, 20th Century Fox, and Paramount Pictures. Since most of Marvel’s film output was co-created Kirby(Captain America, The Fantastic Four, The X-Men, The Avengers, Iron Man, Hulk, The Silver Surfer, Black Panther and Thor), this would have put Marvel’s successful run at the box office in jeopardy.

Marc Toberoff, the lawyer who successful represented the Siegel Estate in a similar claim, states he will appeal the ruling to the Second Circuit, so the issue isn’t completely over.

I’m not a lawyer, but if I had to come up with a reason why the Siegel lawsuit succeeded and Kirby lawsuit did not, it would have to do with when the characters were created. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster created Superman prior to their involvement with DC Comics (they originally tried to approach newspaper syndicates to get a comic strip starring the character in newspapers everywhere), so they did not create the character while working of DC Comics. Jack Kirby, on the other hand, co-created all those characters after being an employee for Atlas/Marvel for three or more years, and a lot of the work was done in conjunction with Atlas/Marvel editor-in-chief Stan Lee. Any work he did on those characters was as an employee of Marvel at the request of or with the direct input of its editor-in-chief. That’s just my opinion, and probably a wrong one at that.

More to come.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

HISTORY OF THE COMIC BOOK FILM: Running Fawcett

Posted on 29 July 2011 by William Gatevackes

In a multi-part series, Comic Book Film Editor William Gatevackes will be tracing the history of comic book movies from the earliest days of the film serials to today’s big blockbusters and beyond. Along with the history lesson, Bill will be covering some of the most prominent comic book films over the years and why they were so special. This time, we’ll cover the first comic book films, ones that still have an effect on today’s comic book films like Captain America: The First Avenger—the superhero movie serials.

While Superman might have blazed the way for the superhero comic book in 1938, his arch-nemesis took the lead in comic book characters being adapted into live action serials. No, it wasn’t Lex Luthor who made the first foray onto the big screen, it was Captain Marvel. Why do I say nemesis? Read on.

Captain Marvel was introduced by Fawcett Comics in the February 1940 dated Whiz Comics #2. He had super-strength like Superman, super-speed like Superman, invulnerability like Superman, a skin-tight costume with a cape like Superman, and a secret identity where he worked as a news reporter. He was also more popular than Superman, starring in the highest selling comic book in the land by the mid-1940s. What might have played a role in Captain Marvel’s greater popularity is the way his character differed from Superman’s. Captain Marvel’s alter ego wasn’t an adult who simply changed clothes to become the hero. His alter ego was Billy Batson, a 12-year-old homeless orphan who sold papers on the street. Through the magic of a wizard, he gained the ability to become the adult Captain Marvel—and got all the powers listed above. Through pluck and determination, he rose from the newsie on the street to a reporter for radio station WHIZ. In other words, he was wish fulfillment, not only for kids who wanted to grow up, but also for people down on their luck looking for hope.

But regardless of what made the character popular, popular he was. Popular enough to become the first superhero to grace movie screens. Republic Pictures produced the 12 installment serial, The Adventures of Captain Marvel. The first installment reached theaters early in 1941.

The serial was quite a bit different from the comic book, eschewing the light-hearted tone of the comic for a more serious, action-oriented format.  Billy Batson wasn’t a radio announcer, but a radio technician for a group of archeologists. The wizard, Shazam, doesn’t visit Billy in a subway tunnel but in an antechamber of a pyramid. And the film Captain Marvel had no problem with killing the bad guys.

It’s ironic that the comic would eventually incorporate an Egyptian theme into the books, most notably in the form of villain Black Adam, who was introduced in the comics four years later.

National Comics, precursor to present day DC Comics, served Fawcett with a cease and desist letter over the Captain Marvel character in June of 1941. Did the serial have a role to play in this action? While National had been very proactive in trying to shut down what they thought were Superman clones (they had even sent one to Fawcett years before over their character, Master Man, which Fawcett ceased publication of), certainly the fact Republic went with Captain Marvel when they couldn’t get the rights for Superman from National didn’t hurt.

Since Captain Marvel was such a success, Fawcett fought back. The battle lasted ten years and included one judgment in favor of Fawcett that was overturned on appeal.  In 1951, the courts ruled in favor of National/DC once and for all. Fawcett closed up shop and essentially went out of business. In an ironic turn, DC, the company that forced Captain Marvel and the other Fawcett character out of business, paid to license said characters in 1972 before buying them outright in 1991.

There is a full-length Captain Marvel film currently stuck in development Hell at Warners (As of 2009, it was listed as being “dead”). But if you wish to view this serial instead, it can be seen at the Internet Archive.

Captain Marvel wasn’t the only Fawcett character who debuted in Whiz Comics #2 that made its way to the big screen. Spy Smasher was another popular Fawcett character that debuted in that issue, and Republic produced a serial featuring him, titled Spy Smasher,  the next year.

If Captain Marvel was Fawcett’s answer to Superman, Spy Smasher was their answer to Batman. His real name was Alan Armstrong and he was a master detective who fought crime (and, of course, spies) with a bunch of handy gadgets and his own fighting prowess.

The serial was more or less true to the original concept, with Spy Smasher battling a Nazi agent in the U.S. named The Mask.

I couldn’t find the Spy Smasher trailer online (although you can watch a three-part You Tube video of the first installment here. But beware! It might be a version of the serial that was edited down for television in the 1960s). However,  I did find one of the greatest living directors mentioning the serial by name and telling of its impact in forming one of the biggest film franchises of present day. (Check around the 1:50 mark)

That’s got to be worth something.

Next Time: More serials, as we cover Bats and Marvels.

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

Teasing THE AVENGERS Teaser (With Screen Grabs)

Posted on 29 July 2011 by Rich Drees

Even casual fans of Marvel Studios’ franchise of superhero films know to stick around at the end of their movies for a short scene that lays groundwork for their long in the planning The Avengers. So it seems odd that the studio would release a short teaser teasing the button scene at the end of Captain America: The First Avenger. But let’s not quibble, at least it’s the first official online release of footage from the Joss Whedon-directed film and probably the only official footage we’re going to see for some time.

Be warned – The clip below contains a moments from the final scene of Captain America: The First Avenger. Though if you haven’t seen the film, you really should. Also, seeing the clip here is no substitute for sticking through Captain America‘s credits to see it in the theater. This only contains a fraction of the scenes you’ll see on the big screen.

After the embed are some screengrabs of the cast.

The Avengers hits theaters next summer.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , ,

New Releases: July 29

Posted on 28 July 2011 by William Gatevackes

1. Cowboys & Aliens (Universal, 3,750 Theaters, 118 Minutes, Rated PG-13): To call this film a comic book movie would be inaccurate. Scott Rosenberg sold this premise to Hollywood nine years before it was ever made into a comic book. It went through production hell over that time, allowing Rosenberg to publish a comic based on the premise in 2006. So it is only a comic book movie by that slimmest of coincidences.

Not helping matters is the fact that the film bears only a passing resemblance to the comic book. Outside of both taking place in the Old West,  involving an alien invasion of Earth, and a shapeshifting alien on the good guys’ side, the two are as different as night and day. The comic was a pretty straight forward, us-vs.-them, genre story, with nary a mention of an amnesiatic cowboy with a space weapon attached to his wrist.

But does have Indiana Jones teaming up with James Bond. So it’s got that going for it, which is nice.

2. The Smurfs (Sony/Columbia, 3,395 Theaters, 86 Minutes, Rated PG): I have to say, this film looks like it smurfing sucks. It only has a smurfing 10% fresh over at Rotten Smurfing Tomatoes, and I imagine that will only get lower as more reviews come in. Way smurfing lower.

The cast is a mixed bag. Some of it, like Neil Patrick Harris, smurfing rock. Others, like Katy Perry as the voice of Smurfette, are dubious at best (Really, what the smurf is she doing supplying a voice?). And Tim Gunn? Acting? I thought I’d be smurfed with a smurf in my smurf, while smurfing a smurfed smurf before I saw that happen. Smurf me.

So, the plot, what there is of it, involves the Smurfs being let loose on real world New York City. The beat the heck out of NPH while being chased by Gargamel (Hank Azaria), who doesn’t want them to boil them down for gold anymore, but to “enhance his magical powers.”

3. Crazy, Stupid, Love. (Warner Brothers, 3,020 Theaters, 118 Minutes, Rated PG-13): Here is a rarity in the world of the summer blockbuster, the intelligent, adult comedy.

Steve Carrell plays a man whose life becomes unravelled when his wife asks for a divorce. Entering the single’s scene after years away, he’s helped by a studly Lothario played byRyan Gosling.

The film is chock full of good actors, including many Oscar nominees and one winner (Marissa Tomei). This film should be a pretty good alternative if you want to get away from all the flash and the noise.

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

Lee Pace Joins Spielberg’s LINCOLN

Posted on 28 July 2011 by Rich Drees

Lee Pace has signed onto the cast of Steven Spielberg’s upcoming biopic Lincoln.

Pace will be playing New York City mayor Fernando Wood, a rather colorful, if corrupt, politician. As New York’s mayor, he argued in favor of the Confederate cause as he was part of a political machine that received illegal funds skimmed from the profitable cotton trade. He even went so far to as to suggest to the City Council that the city secede from the United States and declare itself a “free city,” though they council pretty much laughed at the idea. Wood and Lincoln frequently traded correspondence over the issue.

Daniel Day Lewis is set to star as the sixteenth president.

Pace has also recently been cast in Peter Jackson’s two-part adaption of J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit.

Via Deadline.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

Script Review: NATIONAL LAMPOON’S ANIMAL HOUSE II

Posted on 28 July 2011 by Rich Drees

As this week marks the release of National Lampoon’s Animal House on blu-ray disc as well as the 33r anniversary of the film’s release in theaters, we thought it would be a good time to take a look at the script for a sequel to the classic comedy that was written but never made.

 

National Lampoon’s Animal House II
Second Draft Screenplay by Matty Simmons, Michael Simmons, Andrew B Simmons
Draft Date May 6, 1982

 

 

The early 1980s were a troubled time for the National Lampoon magazine. In the previous decade the magazine burst into American pop culture with a slash-and-burn attitude towards comedy that perfectly suited the post-Watergate cynicism that was sweeping the country. In short time, it quickly became a household name and spun off a popular syndicated radio series. However, the magazine’s popularity didn’t really reach its zenith until the release of the film National Lampoon’s Animal House in the summer of 1978.

But as the cynical 70s gave way to the 1980s and Ronald Reagan’s vision of the country as a shining city on a hill, Nat Lamp (as it is often abbreviated) found its fortunes floundering. The magaine’s three founders – Doug Kenney, Henry Beard and Robert Hoffman – had accepted a buyout clause in their contract back as far back as 1975 and by the end of the decade, many of the magazine’s original staff had already moved on. Some, such as the brilliant Michael O’Donoghue and Anne Beatts, had gone to work in television, helping to launch a little weekend, late-night sketch show for NBC called Saturday Night. Others went west, lured by the big money to be found in Hollywood.

The magazine’s circulation was decreasing and it still hadn’t found a way to follow up on the success of Animal House at the movies. National Lampoon’s Vacation (1983), which screenwriter John Hughes based on one of his Lampoon short stories, was still a year away from being released when Animal House producer and Nat Lamp publisher Matty Simmons decided that the best way to reinvigorate the cinematic brand name of National Lampoon would be returning to Faber College for a second Animal House film.

This would not be the first time an Animal House sequel was considered. After the film became a hit in the summer of 1978, a follow up story was conceived. It was set five years after the events of the first film in 1967′s “Summer of Love” and would feature the Deltas coming together to attend the marriage of their fraternity brother Pinto in Haight-Ashbury, San Francisco. Animal House co-screenwriter Chrris Miller got as far as writing a treatment for the film with Lampoon writer John Weidman, but Universal passed on the idea, reportedly because the recently released American Graffiti sequel also had some similar elements concerning hippies and the Summer of Love and had died at the box office.

There was also an attempt to bring Animal House to television in 1979 as the series Delta House failed as well. Probably inspired by the success CBS had with bring Robert Altman’s anti-war comedy M*A*S*H to television, Delta House was a half-hour sitcom shot in the style of the original film and not on the rather flat, fake sets that most sitcoms were produced on. And while there was no studio audience, much like the early seasons of M*A*S*H, there was a laugh track, supposedly to cue the audience at home as to when they should laugh. The show featured the return of Animal House cast members John Vernon (Dean Wormer), Stephen Furst (Flounder), Bruce McGill (D-Day), and James Widdoes (Hoover) and the pilot episode (“The Legacy,” airdate January 18, 1979) was written by Animal House‘s scriptwriting trio of Harold Ramis, Doug Kenney and Miller.

But despite initially good ratings, and five of its 13 episodes being written by Nat Lamp alum John Hughes, the series only lasted four months. Reportedly producers Simmons and Ivan Reitman had quickly become burned out with arguing with network executives over the content of the show.

Perhaps looking forward to producing an Animal House project without the strictures imposed by television, Simmons decided to go ahead and start developing a sequel somewhere in late 1981/early 1982. There was just one problem- The original writers of Animal House were unavailable. Miller was off working on Anne Beatts television show Square Pegs, which, for better or worse, gave the world Sarah Jessica Parker. Harold Ramis was off working on SCTV. And Doug Kenney was dead, having died under mysterious circumstances with no one knowing if he had accidentally fallen or purposefully jumped off the side of a mountain in Hawaii where he was vacationing following the completion of his work on the comedy Caddyshack.

So Simmons, perhaps bolstered by the fact that he shared a writer’s credit for two episodes of Delta House, took it upon himself to pen the screenplay in conjunction with Michael and Andrew B Simmons. (These two might be Matty Simmons’s sons, but I can’t confirm that online anywhere. There was a Michael Simmons credited as being the singer of the Delta House theme song.)

It’s been five years since the brothers of Delta House wrecked havoc on the Annual Faber College Homecoming Parade and several members of the frat decide that it might be safe to venture back for a weekend visit to their old college haunts. Arriving, though, they are horrified at the changes that their beloved fraternity has undergone. After keeping it closed for half a decade, Dean Wormer has allowed Delta House to reopen, only to fill it with a collection of nerds and geeks – the type to never cause the problems that have been associated with the Deltas in the past. And so Boone, Otter, D-Day, Pinto and Flounder take it upon themselves to instruct their new frat brothers in their fraternity’s infamous history. They almost immediately run afoul of Wormer and the members of Omega House, lead by their old nemesis Doug Neidermeyer. Wormer wants to run the returning Deltas off campus before they sour filthy rich alumni Milton Vanderslaag on donating more money to the college. Things escalate to the point where the Deltas enter into a bet with Vanderslaag, Wormer and the Omegas which puts the future existence of Delta House at risk. To win the bet, all they have to do is best the Omegas in two out of three competitions, contests that the Deltas really aren’t suited for at all.

To be honest, when I started reading this I went in with severely lowered expectations. Animal House is a classic and is one of my few favorite comedies that doesn’t feature the Marx Brothers, another group of outsiders who frequently thumbed their noses at the uptight establishment. And there are moments where I found myself liking what I was reading. But when I put down the script at the end, I had to wonder if my positive response wasn’t because of the affection that I hold for the characters, because this screenplay has a lot of flaws.

Giving credit where it’s due, the Simmonses do manage to approximate the voices of most of the characters. A line from Flounder, Boone or Otter usually reads like something they’d say. Of course, this could partially be attributed to the fact some of the characters’ lines and actions are just reprises of favorite bits from the first film. When Boone and Otter are at center field at the start of the climactic football game, they once again do their “Eric Stratton, damn glad to meet you”/”That was Eric Stratton. He was damn glad to meet you.” bit from the first film’s opening rush party scene.

But this also leads us to the first of the script’s big failing – the pervasive feeling of familiarity. The Deltas trip to the honkytonk roadside bar is an obvious callback to the famous bar scene in the first film. And having your film’s heroes’ fortunes rest on the outcome of a football game is a cliche that dates back as far as the Marx Brother’s Horse Feathers and Harold Lloyd’s 1925 comedy The Freshman. One of Hughes’ Delta House scripts also centered on a football game and I have to wonder if Simmons partly pinched the idea from here.

The next of the big problems with the script lies in its comedic set pieces. Many of the original film’s comic moments were drawn from the screenwriters own college experiences or stories they heard from friends. For all their outrageousness, there’s still the element of reality to the proceedings. (Well, with perhaps the exception of elements of the Homecoming Parade at the end of the film, but by this point, we’re along for the ride.) But here, the writers are just pushing things a little too far past the realm of probability for the sake of a laugh. In the scene where the Deltas cut some wires to a radio transmitter tower owned by the college, electricity suddenly sparks everywhere and then the whole tower just collapses. In another sequence, D-Day laces the punch at a Homecoming function and soon everyone is shedding their clothes to skinny dip in the river or to have sex with each other along the shore. These feel too broad and come across as cartoonish.

The worst transgression in this category is when Dean Wormer and the Neidermeyer brothers set fire to the Deltas’ frat house all the while Boon and Katie are having makeup sex in a room upstairs, oblivious to the conflagration around them. They even continue after they realize that the House is on fire! It stretches believability so badly that if he had a mustache, I’d be expecting Wormer to be twirling its end.

The script is also too scattered and unfocused. It often loses some its characters for long stretches of time, most specifically the new group of Deltas. Also, it doesn’t seem to know what story it wants to tell. Is the film about about the classic Deltas once again besting their rivals at the Omega House or is it about the Deltas inducting their new generation of frat brothers into the fine traditions of partying and chasing girls? At 127 pages, the script is far too long by trying to do both and ultimately each storyline just feels diluted.

There’s also a question about the underlying logic of the script that I couldn’t get out of my head. At the end of the first film, the Deltas sabotaged the Homecoming Parade in retaliation for Dean Wormer flunking them out of Faber and getting their fraternity charter revoked. And yet, just a couple of years later they’re allowed to stroll back on campus for the Homecoming weekend? I would imagine that Wormer’s first act upon seeing anyone of them set foot on the college grounds would have been to pick up the phone and call the police. Certainly the statute of limitations on their actions (destruction of property, inciting a riot, etc) couldn’t have expired yet.

If you’re looking for just a pleasant reunion with the characters you grew to like and hate in the original film, you should know that there are some conspicuous absences amongst the returning Deltas and Omegas. Belushi’s Bluto is the most obvious, but also the most understandable as the actor died just a few months before the draft date on this script. (This leads me to believe that perhaps the more prominent role of D-Day in the script is the result of giving his character much of the action that may have originally been planned for Bluto.) Stork’s absence is similarly understandable due to Kenny’s death. With Miller not participating in the writing, the character he played in the film, Hardbar, is nowhere to be found. On the Omega side, Doug Neidermeyer’s right hand man Greg Marmalade (played by James Daughton) is also missing, his role filled by Doug’s younger brother Brad.

But at the end of the day and this script’s 127 pages the question remains – Is this a necessary story to tell? We already know what the future holds for the Deltas and the Omegas after the Fall of 1962. Do we need to see more reasons why no one will mourn Niedermeyer when he eventually gets fragged by his own troops in ‘Nam? Do we need to see Boone and Katie having marital problems or Flounder on his way to becoming a counselor? Not really. And while we may remain friends with those we meet in college for the rest of our lives, I think that this script teaches us that perhaps it is not the wisest thing to only dwell on one’s past glories.

Comments (1)