Tag Archive | "Jonah Hill"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HISTORY OF THE COMIC BOOK FILM: The Non-Comic Book Superhero, Part VI

Posted on 03 May 2013 by William Gatevackes

In a multi-part series, Comic Book Film Editor William Gatevackes will be tracing the history of comic book movies from the earliest days of the film serials to today’s big blockbusters and beyond. Along with the history lesson, Bill will be covering some of the most prominent comic book films over the years and why they were so special. Today, we examine how superheroes are employed in kid-friendly fare, to good and bad effect.

Comic books, especially superhero comics, were at one time thought of as being exclusively entertainment for kids. Any adult who read comic books would be considered borderline illiterate and not someone you’d want to associate with. I’m fairly certain that there are many people out there that still hold that opinion.

936full-the-incredibles-poster

But comics haven’t been exclusively for kids for almost three decades. While there are some comics that are aimed at the younger set, they are becoming rarer as the years pass. This is a shame not only because there is room in comics for both kids and adults, but also because the world of film has shown that superheroes can be quality entertainment for kids and adults at the same time.

A sterling example of this was 2004’s The Incredibles. This was the sixth film released by Pixar, who were well in the run of quality films by this point. The film was a pastiche on the Fantastic Four with that team’s surrogate family dynamic morphing into a biological family dynamic. Mr. Incredible was the Thing like strong guy, who was immodestly named like the FF’s Mr. Fantastic, whose power set was matched by Elastigirl. Violet had invisibility powers akin to the Invisible Girl and Dash had the youthful impetuousness of Human Torch and Jack-Jack seemed be able to turn into flame (amongst other powers as well).

While there was an antecedent for The Incredibles in the Fantastic Four, that doesn’t mean that it wasn’t original. It was, as most Pixar films are, a film that works for both adults and children, although The Incredibles gave the adults a little more to enjoy. The kids got the slapstick humor and flashy superpowers, while their parents got themes such as the Dad  balancing family life with his “secret”  identity. It was a film about the things you must give up in order to provide for the ones you love and the difficult pursuit of a satisfying balance between what you want to do and what you have to do.

The next film on our list is not quite as complex as The Incredibles, but is one of the few kid’s films to have a “Story by” credit given to an actual seven-year-old kid. That kid was Racer Max Rodriguez, whose father, Robert Rodriguez, decided to adapt the characters they both created around their house to the big screen in the form of The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl in 3-D.

adventures_of_shark_boy_and_lava_girl_in_three_d_xlgThe film centers on a lonely outcast named Max who creates a world where young superheroes Sharkboy and Lavagirl live and have adventures. However, the line between fantasy and reality becomes blurred when the heroes ask Max to come with them to save their world.

The film takes on a Wizard of Oz like dimension as many of the people Max knows appear in the dream world he created in different forms, yet tied to the way Max views them (for example, Max’s real life bully Linus becomes the villain Minus in Max’s fantasy world and his mean teacher Mr. Electridad becomes another villain named Mr. Electricity).

The film was a critical and box office disappointment, but is known for being one of the first films to usher in the 3-D resurgence and for being the first major film role of Taylor Lautner. All those Twimoms who get weak in the knees whenever he takes off his shirt in the Twilight films should take a look at that trailer up there.   He’s practically a baby in this film. They should be overcome with shame.

If you are looking to create a superhero movie for kids, you could do worse for a plot than a superhero high school or a teenager dealing with famous superhero parents. Sky High combines both plot elements to good effect.

skyhighThe film had a lot going for it. It marked Kurt Russell’s return to Disney family fare (although now as the parent instead of the kid), featured geek culture icons Lynda Carter and Bruce Campbell, had a role for Broken Lizard’s Kevin Heffernan and reunited Kids in the Hall members Dave Foley and Kevin McDonald. It was like they were doing a movie with a collection of actors with large cult followings.

The story was solid if conventional. The cast definitely made the most of the material and I really liked the end product. So much so, I am not ashamed to admit that I saw the film in a theater. However, it is with great shame that I admit that the very next year I saw a similarly themed film in the theaters, a film with a whopping 3% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

That’s not bad. For a long time, Zoom: Academy for Superheroes had a 0% fresh rating, meaning it received absolutely no positive reviews at all. I didn’t really consider the film to be that bad, I have definitely seen worse, but the film wasn’t very good either.

zoom_posterIf you were able to get past the fact that the federal government considers a six-year-old girl with super-strength to be a good line of defense against an incredibly powerful, homicidal super villain speeding his way towards Earth, you’d find other things about the film to make you wince. Like what, you may ask? Well, the reliance on gross-out gags for the sake of gross-out gags. There is an extended sequence where the four young trainees lock the more awkward scientist/trainer/mentor (played by a Chevy Chase who either just had bad plastic surgery done or is coming off a bad allergic reaction to a bee sting) in a room used to train the potential heroes how to react to adverse weather conditions. After Chase’s character is pelted by rain, sleet, snow and struck by lightning, a robotic skunk (yes, a robotic skunk) comes out and sprays (yes, the robot skunk has functioning anal scent glands) him in the face. It’s a pretty good spraying. If I recall correctly, Chase allows some of the spray to go into his mouth, which, you know, is one way to make it funnier. Well, if the scene was funny to begin with, maybe.

On top of that,  we get a Smash Mouth-heavy soundtrack, an extended Wendy’s commercial in the middle of the film, a countdown to disaster that doesn’t countdown in linear fashion (it goes from one day to two days then one day again), and Courtney Cox trying to act nerdy and clumsy. If you take away all of that, you have a relatively harmless kids flick. But the problem is, you can’t take all that away.

Megamind-PosterIt’s only fitting to end this installment with Megamind after starting it with The Incredibles, because the two films have a number of similarities beyond both being CGI animated superhero kid flicks. Both films opened on the same day (November 5th), albeit six years apart. One is done by Pixar, the other by Pixar’s main competition in quality and profitability, Dreamworks. Both draw their inspiration from comic book mythos’ (the Fantastic Four mythos is to The Incredibles as the Superman mythos is to Megamind).  Both appeal to adults as well as kids. And both are humorous examinations on superhero tropes.

This film takes a look at the stereotypical super villain who wants nothing more than destroy the superhero of the city he lives in. What happens when he gets what he wishes for? Well, create a new enemy to destroy, become a hero himself, and/or both.

The film had a great cast that would have been perfect even if the film was live-action. I mean, wouldn’t you want to see Brad Pitt, Tina Fey, Jonah Hill and Will Ferrell together in just about anything? While it wasn’t quite as good as The Incredibles, it was good in its own right.

Next time, we discuss why it is best to use original superheroes if you want to make a superhero comedy.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

New Releases: March 16

Posted on 15 March 2012 by William Gatevackes

1. 21 Jump Street (Sony/Columbia, 3,121 Theaters, 109 Minutes, Rated R): Forget about the concept, the 21 Jump Street TV show lends itself to comedy. Abunch of actors pushing 30 playing twentysomethings who pretend to be teenagers to infiltrate high schools to fight crime? And just how many high school districts were in the Jump Street jurisdiction anyway? Enough for four seasons of shows. That just ain’t feasible. In the real world, you usually get three or four precincts to every school district, not the other way around.

Well, enough ranting about a TV show that went off the air over twenty years ago. The show is now making the leap to the big screen in a comedic fashion. Jonah Hill, whose entire film career took place over his twenties and he quite frequently plays teens, and Channing Tatum play cops who infiltrate the local high school to bust a synthetic drug ring.

This film might be worth seeing for the cameos alone. Two of the original four supposedly make an appearance, one of the two has no business slumming even for a cameo. If it is true that he made a cameo, it goes to further prove how cool that actor really is.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

OSCARS 2012: Know Your Nominees:Best Supporting Actor

Posted on 20 February 2012 by William Gatevackes

In the days leading up to the 84th Academy Awards, FilmBuffOnline will be offering profiles on all the nominees in the major categories. Some may be well know, others might be new to you, but if you need a refresher on these talented nominees, here it is.

Kenneth Branagh

Nominated for: Playing noted British thespian Sir Laurence Oliver in My Week with Marilyn.

Other honors for this role:

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, Washington DC Film Critics Association.

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 Critics’ Choice Awards.

Nominated, Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture, The 69th Annual Golden Globe Awards.

Nominated, Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role, 2012 Screen Actors Guild Award.

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 BAFTA Awards.

Where you might know him from:

Many might say that they know him from his work in film adaptations of Shakespeare (Henry V, Much Ado About Nothing, Othello, Hamlet, Love’s Labour Lost), aurguably his most famous role is as Professor Gilderoy Lockhart in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.

History with Oscar:

Kenneth Branagh has four previous nominations.

1990: Best Actor, Henry V (Lost to Daniel Day-Lewis, My Left Foot).

1990: Best Director, Henry V (Lost to Oliver Stone, Born on the Fourth of July).

1993: Best Short Film, Live Action, Swan Song (Lost to Sam Karmann, Omnibus).

1997: Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published, Hamlet (Lost to Billy Bob Thornton, Sling Blade).

Jonah Hill

Nominated for: Playing Peter Brand, the real-life statistician who help Billy Beane revolutionize baseball in Moneyball.

Other honors for this role:

Nominated, Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture, The 69th Annual Golden Globe Awards.

Nominated, Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role, 2012 Screen Actors Guild Award.

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 BAFTA Awards.

Where you might know him from:

Hill is most known for his comedic work, especially his collaborations with Judd Apatow, most notably, Superbad. He was also in Knocked Up, Get Him to the Greek, and The Sitter, and provided voices for animated features such as How to Train Your Dragon  and Megamind.

History with Oscar:

This is Jonah Hill’s first Oscar nomination.

Nick Nolte

Nominated for: playing Paddy Conlon, a recovering alcoholic ex-fighter who trains his estranged son for an MMA tournament in Warrior.

Other honors for this role:

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 Critics’ Choice Awards.

Nominated, Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role, 2012 Screen Actors Guild Award.

Where you might know him from:

Nolte’s career spans over forty years, and includes many iconic roles in films such as North Dallas Forty, 48 Hours, Cape Fear and Hulk and the television miniseries, Rich Man, Poor Man.

History with Oscar:

Nick Nolte has two previous nominations.

1992: Best Actor in a Leading Role, The Prince of Tides (Lost to Anthony Hopkins, Silence of the Lambs).

1999: Best Actor in a Leading Role , Affliction (Lost to Roberto Benigni, Life is Beautiful).

Christopher Plummer

Nominated for: playing Hal Fields, a gay man who comes out to his son after his wife’s passing, only to succumb to terminal cancer in Beginners.

Other honors for this role:

Nominated, Best Supporting Actor, Washington DC Film Critics Association Award.

Won, Best Supporting Actor, National Board of Review Awards.

Won, Best Supporting Actor, 37th Annual Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards.

Won, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 Critics’ Choice Awards.

Won, Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture, The 69th Annual Golden Globe Awards.

Won, Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role, 2012 Screen Actors Guild Award.

Won, Best Supporting Actor, 2012 BAFTA Awards.

Nominated, Best Supporting Male, 2012 Film Independent Spirit Awards.

Where you might know him from:

In his seven decades as a working actor with almost 200 roles to his credit, he has done solid work in many a film, television show, and voice over work. However, his most iconic role would have to be that of Captain Von Trapp in the film version of The Sound of Music.

History with Oscar:

Surprisingly, Christopher Plummer only has one previous nomination.

2010: Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role , The Last Station (Lost to Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds).

Max von Sydow

Nominated for: playing a mute recluse in the film adaptation of Jonathan Safran Foer’s 9/11-themed novel, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close.

Other honors for this role:

von Sydow has not been nominated for any other major award for this role.

Where you might know him from:

Von Sydow’s career has spanned eight decades. He is know in certain circles for his work with Swedish director Ingmar Bergman, but some of his more notable roles are Father Merrin in The Exorcist, and Ming the Merciless in Flash Gordon.

History with Oscar:

Like Christopher Plummer, Max von Sydow only has one previous nomination.

1989: Best Actor in a Leading Role, Pelle the Conqueror (Lost to Dustin Hoffman, Rain Man).

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oscar Nominations: Who Will Make The Cut?

Posted on 23 January 2012 by William Gatevackes

It’s that time of year again. Tomorrow, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will announce the nominees for the 84st Annual Academy Awards.

Every year there are snubs and surprises, thrills and controversies. There is no way of knowing who will be nominated, especially in a year when the Best Picture nominees could be 5 films, or ten films, or any number in between.  We here at FilmBuffOnLine, who believe the day nominations are announced should be a National holiday, are going to try and handicap the process for you.

We will try to tell you, in the most non-committal way possible, who we think are Almost Certain to get a nomination, who Definite May Be nominated, and whose nomination is a Outside Shot in the major categories (the four acting categories, Best Director, and Best Picture). We are trying to cover all bases, but don’t come to us if you lose money on your Oscar Nomination pool.

Best Actor:

Almost Certain:

George Clooney, The Descendants; Jean Dujardin, The Artist

Definite Maybe:

Michael Fassbender, Jane Eyre, X-Men: First Class, A Dangerous Method or Shame; Leonardo DiCaprio, J Edgar; Brad Pitt, Moneyball

Outside Shot:

Demián Bichir, A Better Life; Ryan Gosling, Crazy, Stupid Love, Drive, or The Ides of March; Gary Oldman, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Clooney and Dujardin have won the most hardware this year, which not only make them a lock to be nominated, but also likely one of them will be taking home the award.

Fassbender has been great in a lot of films (listing X-Men: First Class was a bit of a joke, he’ll most likely get the nod for Shame, but I think he gave an Oscar worthy performance in that film) so he is practically a lock for a nomination. The next two are about 50/50 of getting in. The Academy seems to have something against DiCaprio, and his performance as J. Edgar Hoover while not horrible (he got a lot of nods for other awards for it), was not amazing enough to overcome that film’s lackluster performance critically or financially. Brad Pitt eked out a couple of wins along the way (most notably, the New York and Boston critics), and while Moneyball was well received, I don’t see it as 100% Oscar material.

If DiCaprio and Pitt don’t get nominated, there are worthy choices waiting to take a spot. Bichir was great in a small film with a limited release that opened over the summer. These all work against him, but he is deserving of a nod. Gosling, like Fassbender, was great in a lot of films this year, and has been nominated before, but none of the films he was in seem to pass Oscar muster. Oldman was flat out amazing in Tinker Tailor, but his subtle performance might be lost on Oscar voters.

Best Actress

Almost Certain:

Viola Davis, The Help;  Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady; Tilda Swinton, We Need to Talk About Kevin; Michelle Williams, My Week with Marilyn

Definite Maybe:

Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs

Outside Shot:

Bérénice Bejo, The Artist; Elizabeth Olsen, Martha Marcy May Marlene; Charlize Theron, Young Adult

On paper, this seems to be the category that seems to have the least wiggle room. Davis, Streep, Close, Swinton and Williams are all in the type of roles that Oscar voters seem to trip over giving nominations to. But in every round of nominations, there are bound to be surprises, and this category is ripe for one.

Bejo and Olsen have the best chance of breaking in, in my opinion. But Bejo is getting pushed for Best Supporting Actress instead of Lead, even though she essentially had a lead role. Olsen got good notices in her role, but suffers from the same “too early/too small handicap” that Bichir has. Theron has received nods for Best Actress in the Golden Globes (where there are nominations for comedy and drama) and the Critic’ Choice Awards (where there are six nominees). She has an Oscar pedigree, but Young Adult could very well be seen as less than Oscar worthy.

Best Supporting Actor:

Almost Certain:

Kenneth Branagh, My Week with Marilyn; Christopher Plummer, Beginners

Definite Maybe:

Albert Brooks, Drive; Jonah Hill, Moneyball

Outside Shot:

Nick Nolte, Warrior; Viggo Mortensen, A Dangerous Method; Andy Serkis, Rise of the Planet of the Apes or The Adventures of Tintin; Armie Hammer, J Edgar; Tom Hardy, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Plummer has won the Golden Globe and Critic’s Choice award Supporting Actor, making him a lock for an  Oscar nomination, if not the actual award. Branagh has been consistently nominated for his apt portrayal of Laurence Olivier, so he could get the nod as well. Slightly less certain but highly possible are nomination of two actors best known for comedy, Brooks and Hill, for playing against type. After that, place your bets. Will Nolte’s “sports mentor” role make the grade? Will Mortensen’s change of pace role as Sigmund Freud catch the Academy’s attention? Will the Academy make a statement and move towards the future by giving Serkis the nod for his superior motion-capture work? Does the Academy like J Edgar more than the critics and the general public do, thereby swing the nod to Hammer? Will Hardy represent Tinker Tailor‘s stellar cast with a nomination? Will it be another cast member? Or will the film be ignored?

Best Supporting Actress

Almost Certain:

Octavia Spencer, The Help; Bérénice Bejo, The Artist

Definite Maybe:

Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids

Outside Shot:

Jessica Chastain, The Help or Take Shelter; Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs; Carey Mulligan, Shame; Shailene Woodley, The Descendants

What I said for Christopher Plummer above also applies to Spencer. The only chance Bejo doesn’t get nominated here is if she gets nominated for Best Actress. But that race is crowded so I think she’ll land here. She is deserving.

The only thing keeping me from making McCarthy almost certain is the Academy’s apparent hatred of the comedy. They do not like to give nominations from comedies, no matter how good the role or film is. This time, though, I think they’ll make an exception.

After that, pick two. Chastain and Woodley might have a slight advantage, but McTeer has a good chance and Mulligan could sneak in.

Best Director:

Almost Certain:

Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist; Martin Scorsese, Hugo

Definite Maybe:

Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris;  Alexander Payne, The Descendants

Outside Shot:

David Fincher, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo; Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life; Bennett Miller, Moneyball; Steven Spielberg, War Horse or The Adventures of Tintin; Tate Taylor, The Help

Hazanavicius is definitely most deserving and Scorsese won the Golden Globe, so they should both be nominated. After that, Payne is almost a lock, as is Allen, due to the number of nominations they received. After that, well, ot depends. Fincher got a Directors Guild nomination, Malick has been on a lot of west coast critics awards list, which might be a barometer of how the Academy will go. Miller might ride the surprising accolades Moneyball is getting this award season with a nomination. And months ago, it looked like it wouldn’t be a question if Spielberg would be nominated, but for which film. Now, here he is, a long shot for any nomination at all. Weird. And Taylor has to be consider taking into account the number of great performance that came from that film.

Best Picture:

Almost Certain:

The Artist; The Descendants

Definite Maybe:

Hugo; The Help ; Midnight in Paris

Outside Chance:

The Tree of Life; War Horse; Moneyball; The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo; The Adventures of Tintin; Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy or just about any other film out there that has a miniscule amount of buzz.

Not having a definite number of nominees beforehand really plays havoc with the prognosticating business. I tried to pick out the five most likely films to get nominated, but with the possibility of five more, well, it could be any film of a certain stature.

So, what do you think? Am I on to something, or totally wrong? I guess we’ll find out tomorrow.

Comments (0)

Tags: , ,

Red Band Trailer: 21 JUMP STREET

Posted on 02 November 2011 by Rich Drees

Sony has released a red band trailer for its upcoming action-comedy 21 Jump Street. Based on the 1980s series that launched Johnny Depp’s career, the film stars Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum as two cops who are assigned to a special squad that goes undercover in high schoolsto root out drug dealers. Where the original series was played as a straight cop drama, this big screen version is being played strictly for laughs. (Because that worked so well for The Green Hornet.) The movie is directed by Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs‘s Phil Lord and Chris Miller making their live action debut here.

While I wasn’t much of a fan of the original series when it aired in the 80s -  I thought the premise a mite implausible given that most teenagers usually knew a couple of students at other schools and word would get around pretty fast if there were undercover cops showing up on various school systems – I think that this is an absolute terrible direction to go with the material.

And this makes the third day in a row we’ve had a story about an old television series heading to the big screen following Monday‘s news about a Fall Guy movie and yesterday‘s story that Bill Paxton will be directing a revival of Kung Fu. Will tomorrow bring a fourth story of an old television series being turned into a movie? We’ll see.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

“IT Crowd”‘s Richard Ayoade Joins NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH

Posted on 14 September 2011 by Rich Drees

British comic actor Richard Ayoade, best known on this side of the Atlantic as one of the socially awkward The IT Crowd, has been cast in the upcoming Akiva Schaffer-directed science-fiction comedy Neighborhood Watch. Reportedly, Ayoade got the role after filmmakers passed on using Chris Tucker.

The film, written by Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, centers on a group of suburbaniutes who form a neighborhood crime watch group only to uncover a much larger conspiracy. The film stars Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, Jonah Hill and Rosemarie DeWitt.

Ayoade has been making some headway into Hollywood over the last couple of years. His British independent film directorial debut Submarine was distributed by the Weinstein Company last year. He has also directed a number of episodes of the series Community. His IT Crowd co-star Chris Dowd has been making similar in-roads as well. This summer he had a co-starring role in the hit Brides Maids and next summer will be seen in Judd Apatow’s This Is Forty. Hopefully, their success will not preclude them returning for another season or two of IT Crowd.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Depp Confirmed For A 21 JUMP STREET Cameo

Posted on 25 April 2011 by Rich Drees

Johnny Depp is heading back to where it pretty much all began.

Coming Soon has confirmed that the actor will be making an appearance in the upcoming 21 Jump Street film, the big screen adaption of the 1980s television series that launched his career.

The film version is being directed by Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs co-directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller and is set to star Jonah Hill, Channing Tatum, Ice Cube, Brie Larson, Rob Riggle, DeRay Davis, Dave Franco and Jake Johnson. Hill has been vocal about how Michael Bacall’s screenplay included a spot for a cameo from Depp and that he hoped he would want to do it.

Although he had appeared in a few films, most notably the first installment of the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise, it was Depp’s four year run on the original 21 Jump Street television series that catapulted his career into the stratosphere. Although much of the attention he received at the time was based more on his looks than anything else, it was his first post-Jump Street project, Tim Burton’s Edward Scissorhands, which convinced everyone that he was more than just a pretty face.

The 21 Jump Street film is currently in production and is scheduled to hit theaters on March 16, 2012.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

New Belushi Biopic In The Works

Posted on 12 August 2010 by Rich Drees

Bob Woodward’s biography of the late comic actor John Belushi, Wired: The Short Life and Fast Times of John Belushi was almost universally reviled upon its release in 1984, just two years after the comic actor’s death at age 33. That didn’t stop a film adaptation, with title shortened down to just Wired, coming out in 1989, though that was equally reviled.

But with Woodward’s book long out of print and Wired never even making it to DVD, perhaps the time has come for someone to do a more – Shall we say fact-based? – look at the life of the man who brought us Samurai’s in the workplace and the joys of collegiate food fights and introduced a new generation to the blues. Hangover director Todd Phillips seems to think so, as he is teaming with writer Steven Conrad to develop a new Belushi biopic.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, Phillips is only signed to produce a potential film, not direct, though directing may not be entirely out of the picture. Belushi’s widow, Judith Belushi Pisano, will be serving as an executive producer, so don’t expect the backlash for this project that Woodward’s book and subsequent film adaptation received.

Of course, even though the ink on the deal for rights to Belushi’s life story hasn’t dried yet, people have already begun speculating on who would be a good casting choice to play the comic. Not surprisingly, Zach Galifianakis’ name has been floated, based in part on that actor’s recent collaboration with Phillips on The Hangover. I don’t think he would be a good choice though, as I haven’t really seen him deliver any kind of range in his film appearances, certainly not what would be needed to bring Belushi to life on the screen. Jonah Hill’s name has also been floated, but I’m not sure he can bring the manic energy that fueled so much of Belushi’s comedy.

Personally, I would think that Artie Lange would make a pretty good cinematic Belushi. Although his own career has never hit the heights that Belushi’s did, Lange’s own path mirrors Belushi’s in several respects. They both were touted as breakout stars when the sketch comedy shows they appeared on premiered. While Belushi would parlay his Saturday Night Live popularity into a short lived movie career, Lange’s substance abuse problems caused him to be dropped from Mad TV after only a year and a half. But Lange’s ongoing battles with drugs could provide him insight on Belushi’s own struggles.

Comments (2)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Releases: June 4

Posted on 03 June 2010 by William Gatevackes

1. Marmaduke (Fox, 3,213 Theaters, 87 Minutes, Rated PG): Okay, I am not what you call a fan of the  Marmaduke comic strip. The only enjoyment I get from it is reading Josh over at Comics Curmudgeon compare the dog to a flesh-eating, demon beast.

But I have read the strip and I can say in no uncertain terms that Marmaduke does not talk. DOES NOT TALK!!!

I know that with the success of Garfield and Alvin and the Chipmunks, the market for talking cartoon animals is through the roof. But why go and adapt a comic strip, no matter how lame it is, to the big screen if you are going to change the basic elements of it to make it fit. This film didn’t need to be based on Marmaduke. It could have been a truly original concept about a really big talking dog. Because whatever good will and audience the film will get will be shot once Owen Wilson’s voice comes out of the dog’s mouth.

Besides that, it looks completely awful.

2. Killers (Lionsgate, 2,859 Theaters, 100 Minutes, Rated PG-13): Katherine Heigl seems to be channeling her inner Goldie Hawn for this flick, being part ditz/part savvy. This is not a bad thing and makes me more responsive to this film that any of her previous efforts.

Another selling point is Ashton Kutcher, who has dial back the pompous assness he usually bring with him to any film he does.

The plot involves a woman who is swept off her feet by the man of her dreams, only to find out that he is a spy and has a hit out on him. Instead of going on their honeymoon, they go on the run.

I think this has the potential to be a slice above the normal romantic/action comedy. But , then again, with the track record of the people involved, that isn’t a given.

3. Get Him To The Greek (Universal, 2,696 Theaters, 109 Minutes, Rated R): This film is the ipso facto sequel to 2008′s Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Why ipso facto? Because this film has made a few major changes.

Russell Brand’s Aldous Snow was in both movies, but in the former, he was a spacey, self-centered, narcassistic twit, and in this one, he is a drug-addled, flighty, childlike twit. There might not seem to be that much difference between the two, but it is telling when you see it in action.

At least Brand is playing the same character. In the first movie, Hill played a creepy, obsessive fan by the name of Matthew the Waiter. In this film, he is still a fan of Snow’s, but is a record executive by the name of Aaron Green.

I don’t know why they felt the need to change the characters around so much. There was potential for a caper film with the characters from the first movie staying just the way they are. Well, anyway.

Look for a possible cameo by FBOL head honco Rich Drees during one of the concert scenes. If you see someone who looks like an emaciated Bruce Campbell, that is probably him.

4. Splice (Warner Brothers, 2,450 Theaters, 104 Minutes, Rated R): The “Scientists thumbing their nose s at science only to have sciene thumb it back at them hard” scenario has been a horror convention for as long as there has been horror. So powerful is the plot that is still alive today.

Adrian Brody and Sarah Polley play scientist forbidden from practicing their brand of science–cloning people. The pair decide to scoff at the law and combine human and animal DNA to create a new lifeform. Said lifeform grows up into a mythological-like creature who has major issues with its parents. Chaos and destruction ensues.

This film seems to have all the elements that makes this kind of story a winner. Unfortunately, it’s coming out on a very busy weekend. And how could anything in this film ever match the horror that is Marmaduke?

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Review: GET HIM TO THE GREEK

Posted on 03 June 2010 by Rich Drees

Aldous Snow is in decline.

Once of the biggest hardest partying rock stars on the planet, his seven year stint of being clean and sober has come to a crashing end when his latest album “African Child” an attempt at being socially conscious is labeled by critics as being “the worst thing to happen to Africa since apartheid.”

But Snow has at least one loyal fan in Aaron (Jonah Hill), a low level functionary at Snow’s record label, who suggests to his boss a concert commemorating a legendary performance of Snow’s at Los Angeles’ Greek Theater a decade earlier as a way to boost revenues. Label head Sergio (Sean Coombs) likes the idea so much that he assigns Aaron the task of escorting Snow from his home in London to the LA venue. But what sounds like a dream assignment quickly gets out of hand as Snow’s hard partying ways aren’t very conducive to keep a strict travel schedule and also fairly seductive to the straight-laced Aaron.

Hill and Brand are likable enough screen personas and it is much to their credit that the movie is as enjoyable and watchable as it is. Brand deserves a special commendation for keeping us interested in his character, even after he gives Aaron a thoroughly hateful and spiteful dressing down in a Las Vegas hotel room. It’s an ugly turn for the character and one where the audience could have turned on him easily.

Brand and Hill’s chemistry helps move the film through some sequences that otherwise feel off in terms of character motivation. There are several moments when it seems as if characters are making decisions based more on the needs of moving the story to a certain point or to start a comedy set piece rather than out of their character’s nature.

However, there is one sequence that not even Hill and Brand can salvage. It comes towards the end of the film when Aldous tries to help repair Aaron and his girlfriend’s broken relationship. A suggestion is made and implemented. While it is supposed to be awkward and uncomfortable for those involved, it is even more uncomfortable for the audience to watch, to the point of being humorless and off-putting. It is a fatal misstep from which the movie never really recovers.

That’s not to say that the movie doesn’t contain plenty of good moments and I would be lying if I said that I didn’t laugh several times through its length. The rock and pop songs that Aldous and his ex-wife sing, along with their attendant videos, are hilariously more entendre than double entendre. Sean Combs turns in a surprisingly funny performance as the intense record company exec and the excesses we imagine that pop stars indulge in are sent up in a hilarious Mulligan’s Stew of narcotics called a “Jeffrey.”

While Get Him To The Greek starts off strong, it ultimately comes off as a poorly organized road trip. It invariably loses its way, leaving one more than just a bit worn out by the time its destination is reached.

Comments (0)