|
Exorcist: The Beginning
Reviewed by Rich Drees
One of the
worst things to do when reviewing a film is to take the movie to task for
being something it's not. A poorly written review would rake a film like
The Passion Of The Christ over hot coals for not having any zippy
musical numbers in it like Jesus Christ Superstar. However, in the
case of The Exorcist: The Beginning, a prequel to the classic 1973
horror film, it's tempting to review the film from director Renny Harlin for
not being a film by director Paul Schrader. To explain, when The
Exorcist: The Beginning went into production, director Schrader was at
the helm, having promised the studio a psychological horror film exploring
the faith and early days of the 1973 film's title character, Father
Lancaster Merrin. Upon delivery of a completed version, studio execs decided
that a psychological horror film isn't what they wanted after all, fired
Schrader and brought in Harlin to rework the script and entirely reshoot the
film with more of the blood and gore that they expected. But, as the old
saying goes, "Be careful of what you wish for."
The film
is a misfire, and aggressively so, on all counts, ignoring what made the
original Exorcist film a classic. There's no real build up of tension
or fear, both of which were used with masterful precision in the original.
Any scares in the film are cheaply earned through quick edits to a gory
image. The studio mandated gore is over the top and oft times badly done.
Story
wise, the film lifts from a lot of sources but feels mostly derived from the
action films from earlier in Harlin's career. Merrin is the rough-shaven,
disillusioned anti-hero, a priest on the outs with the church. He spends
much of his time, running around, trying to figure out what is going on
before he has his climactic mano a demon showdown. The revelation
that the Vatican had knowledge of what might be behind the mysterious goings
on
feels lifted from such religious conspiracy stories such as Stigmata
(1999) and the recent New York Times bestseller The DaVinci Code. The
final confrontation between colonial British soldiers and a group of African tribesmen
looks like a low budget community theatre version of Zulu (1964).
The
screenplay is a choppy mess. Portions of the film feel like Harlin and
screenwriter Alexi Hawley are intent on nothing more than recreating a few
moments from the original film, without any of the surround meaning or
subtext. One shocking aspect from the original, the demon's vulgar swearing
at Merrin, comes off so badly that the audience laughs. Merrin's character
arc is non-existent. He simply moves through a series of events, until the
script needs him to suddenly decide to renew his faith in God and become a
priest again. Of course he'll find his way back to his faith; it's just that
the script devotes no time at all to what should be the most important
element of the story. Many scenes are unnecessary, adding nothing to the
overall story and just not going anywhere in and of themselves.
The
special effect work in this film is just plain bad. The computer-generated
hyenas are poorly rendered while several background composites are poorly
integrated with the foreground live action. Harlin is unrestrained with his
use of computerized visual effects, never realizing that just because you
can put something like a new computerized riff of the original film's
infamous "Spider Walk" sequence, doesn't necessarily mean that you should. A
board of pinned butterflies that suddenly comes alive looks ridiculous and
mechanical. Much of the make up, including the boils on Alan Ford's face, is
equally bad.
By the
time the film draws to a close, fans will probably be relieved that the
exclusion of the original film's haunting theme, “Tubular Bells”, means that
at least one part of the original film will remain untainted by association
with this mess.
When the
original Exorcist was released in 1973, the film was so powerfully
received that there were reports of people leaving screenings in terror,
unable to watch any more. With The Exorcist: The Beginning there will
be people leaving the film, unable to watch any more, but for
an entirely different reason. |