HANCOCK Sequel Hires Writers

Hancock1Will Smith’s return to superheroics took another step forward with the hiring of Adam Fierro and Glen Mazzara to script a sequel to Smith’s 2008’s summer blockbuster Hancock.

In the original film, Smith played an alcoholic superhero who has no memory of how he gained his powers. The Hollywood Reporter states that the film’s original production team, including director Peter Berg, are expected to return for the follow up.

If Will Smith indeed has a superpower, it is the incredible ability to take a really crappy movie and still turn it into a big moneymaker for a studio. Such is the case with his summer 2008 superhero film Hancock. Myself and many other critics didn’t like the film at all, but still managed to pull over $624 million at the box office. And that kind of box office take makes a studio think sequel.

But while I thought Hancock had some serious flaws, mostly due to the near dozen years that its script went through numerous writers and rewrites, I am not too put out by the possibility of a sequel. One of my complaints with the film was that the mythology behind Smith’s character and his origin was never really explained. In its place was a vague line or two about where he may have come from. Without a deeper understanding of his origins, the limitations about his power and what happens when gets in proximity with another of his kind simply felt like plot devices. If a sequel will delve deeper into the character’s backstory, then I am intrigued.

My main concern is Berg’s apparent involvement with the proposed sequel. While Hancock‘s long development process did dull many of its sharp satiric edges, Berg’s direction was all over the place in regards to its tone. With him being involved with the project from the beginning rather than being brought on board at the last minute, Berg will have a better grasp of the material this time around.

Avatar für Rich Drees
About Rich Drees 7203 Articles
A film fan since he first saw that Rebel Blockade Runner fleeing the massive Imperial Star Destroyer at the tender age of 8 and a veteran freelance journalist with twenty-five years experience writing about film and pop culture. He is a member of the Philadelphia Film Critics Circle.
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William Gatevackes
William Gatevackes
August 25, 2009 9:54 am

The thing that bothered me most about Hancock was the tone . A drama about a superhero gone to seed? I can buy that. A comedy about a superhero gone to seed? Could work if done right. A conventional superhero film with an African-American protagonist? We need one of those.

Hancock couldn’t decide what it wanted to be so it was all three–alternating between the first two in the first half and the go the traditional superhero route during the last half withno connecting tissue between. Hopefully, the sequel will be more consistent.